urshanabi

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

yeah, im left-handed idk if that makes a difference

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (4 children)

what you said reminds me of what Stalin said in an interview with Emil Ludwig, link here

Stalin: You are being modest.

Ludwig: No, that is really so, and for that very reason I shall put questions that may seem strange to you. Today, here in the Kremlin, I saw some relics of Peter the Great and the first question I should like to ask you is this: Do you think a parallel can be drawn between yourself and Peter the Great? Do you consider yourself a continuer of the work of Peter the Great?

Stalin: In no way whatever. Historical parallels are always risky. There is no sense in this one.

Ludwig: But after all, Peter the Great did a great deal to develop his country, to bring western culture to Russia.

Stalin: Yes, of course, Peter the Great did much to elevate the landlord class and develop the nascent merchant class. He did very much indeed to create and consolidate the national state of the landlords and merchants. It must be said also that the elevation of the landlord class, the assistance to the nascent merchant class and the consolidation of the national state of these classes took place at the cost of the peasant serfs, who were bled white.

As for myself, I am just a pupil of Lenin’s, and the aim of my life is to be a worthy pupil of his. The task to which I have devoted my life is the elevation of a different class — the working class. That task is not the consolidation of some “national” state, but of a socialist state, and that means an international state; and everything that strengthens that state helps to strengthen the entire international working class. If every step I take in my endeavor to elevate the working class and strengthen the socialist state of this class were not directed towards strengthening and improving the position of the working class, I should consider my life purposeless.

So, you see, your parallel does not fit.

As regards Lenin and Peter the Great, the latter was but a drop in the sea, whereas Lenin was a whole ocean.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

yo you hear about MEGA? link here.

I read kohei saito read some journals or writing of marx before they were released, and he mentioned marx near the end of his life was studying the natural sciences and specifically ecology.

makes sense, his ideas fall into place with it quite well, and we know he sent darwin a copy of kapital vol 1 and a letter saying his work was incredible.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

bringing in insights or a synthesis from the natural sciences to ml theory or vice-versa

honestly though if I could author a piece on science for the people or another marxist and natural science publication I'd die satisfied

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Love the thinkpads that have the off-center touchpad

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

What is the joke or story of 'I forgot'?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

We are both atheist however I have to appear pious at times, I hope that it doesn't get me into trouble with her parents who are rather anti-religious and who don't believe that I am atheist

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

That photo of Maduro reminds me of when I was a kid and held marbles in my cheeks

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

Another interluder, you could also try Imperialism: A Study (1902) by Hobson who was a British economist and as far as I understand explains the same things as Lenin in his book on Imperialism.

Link to a copy

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I think the long term commitment is there for everyone and it's the only way to undeestand how focusing quarter to quarter by executives leads to this result.

Everyone is committed to profit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh, what a god one, any other typographic jokes?

 

Hello comrades, I read a comment on a post either on lemmygrad or hexbear talking about how most discourse happening was of poor quality and indicative of a lack of genuine leftist groups in the imperial core. Basically if there were patty's with some teeth they would enforce party discipline and education and that would lead to higher quality discourse online.

I also read some of Lenins2ndcat's comments which were very patient when they were interacting with users from other communities.

Is there anyway to work on like, an online party discipline? Or like having users who are very good at discussing with libs have a more concerted approach to their interactions? It really seems that much of us are often too aggressive and meme-y and as fun as that is it really isn't productive.

I get that this isn't how praxis or anything happens, it seems more like the way we engage could be more productive and fruitful in the long term and considerations like this might go a long way.

TL;DR Planned economy but for memeposting

view more: next ›