storksforlegs

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

There aren't really any currently, honestly.

Bill Burr (who isnt actually a conservative) still tells "politically incorrect" or mocking progressive comedy kinds of jokes, without actually being shitty or hateful, so he might come closest. But even he is fairly progressive really, or at least he tries to be.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago

how so the democrats?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Funny how the article only voices responses from the trump campaign denying everything without any challenge.

(and by funny,Imean shitty)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

What a sane and not at all ludicrous response.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Hopefully they have known about this for some time and are preparing

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

how big is that hand?!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No, Democracy isn't dead. Its wounded and limping, but its still alive enough at the moment. Otherwise why would the billionaires and other assholes be trying so hard to discourage voting? It does matter if you vote. Fashy types want people to think it doesnt matter and sit it out.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

This reminded me of a documentary i saw about crow intelligence years ago on this topic, its worth a watch:

https://youtu.be/LF77qpbvkxo?si=OQusmWADgP9I4VBe

very interesting... ( ffwd to 44:00 or so to see more on their grudges, as shown by the "mask experiment".)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I disagree. Presidents dont usually need an office to see if their orders are legally sound, as other than Trump presidents don't typically suggest doing illegal things. Making it easier for anyone in power to ram through illegal orders is a bad thing.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

the first person who develops a browser that effectively filters out AI results is going to do very well

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

no?

Journalistic standards exist. But for those you need qualified human journalists to give a crap about that kind of thing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

are you kidding?

 

(you see BBC? This is how you headline. )

 

102
good news! (imgs.xkcd.com)
 

view more: next ›