socialpankakemix

joined 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

yeah but ladybird devs care more about enforcing male centric pronouns than spending all of like 5 minutes changing him to they after many people requested it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

looks like somebody's trying to justify their gambling addiction

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I suddenly really want some latex thigh highs

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

a hungry dog in the streets in my ass

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

they are shitposting about shitposting shit vegan pet food not shitposting about vegan pet food, very different.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

my intent is not to harrass you, if you agree that prison for homeless people is bad, then my only point of contention was the use of the language, and i hope you can see why i interpreted what you said the way i did.

i spent like 6 years homeless myself, i dont particularly like the idea that anybody could be put into a sanctuary district for being homeless. most homeless people i personally know would be very opposed to the idea of being placed in a sanctuary district, because they have interacted with social welfare programs before and know that they are ineffective at best, and actively harmful at worst, and the sanctuary district we see in the show is a prime example of that

the people who get placed there did nothing wrong, and are now prisoners in some fucked up fend for yourself cage. there were promises of being placed in a job, that the sanctuary disctricts are there to help the people in them. that is the exact opposite of what they do, its only a way to sweep the problem under the rug

you say some may prefer to be put into a sanctuary district than be arrested for being homeless, i dont see a difference between the two whatsoever.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

you can say bob is uglier than Dave sure, but if it's not true then it means nothing, similarly if you call something unkind kind, then that also means nothing. you said that sanctuary districts would be kinder, in order to be kinder they must first be kind, so yes you did say sanctuary districts are kind.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago (6 children)

if you say something is kinder, then it must pass the bar of being kind first. I would say none of the things being described, (spitting , stabbing, and locking people away) counts as kind in the first place

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (8 children)

you cant leave a sanctuary district, thats a prison, why would anybody want to go there? theres three main ways you end up there, you are too poor, your caught sleeping on the streets, or you have mental problems and cant afford the healthcare.

inside the sanctuarys you have no guarantee for housing, no way to get a job, increased gang activity, more mentally unstable people, food shortages, how is that any better than living on the streets in our world?

the rulings from the scotus is the first step to sanctuary districts my friend, and if you think that locking poor people in cages is kind, then you have a funny definition of kindness.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago (10 children)

this is exactly like saying homeless people would rather go to prison than be homeless.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

you would think it would take less time to make the change than to justify your actions and create bad will towards the project

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (7 children)

did they ever stop being little bitches about pronouns?

view more: ‹ prev next ›