that is such a stupid metric.
it's not like hiroshima was super hot for a day or two because the bomb went off, and the earth is enourmous compared to the city of hiroshima.
in trying to make a meaningless number (heat gained per second) into something people can understand, they just made another meaningless statement
I mean it might be more secure, it might be less secure, we just can't read through the source for windows, so we won't know until linux is attacked as much as windows. It would (will?) definitely be interesting to find out.
freecad is horrible, not really worth trying.
I've heard of people getting fusion 360 running great with a snap, but others say it has issues. the github for it is being actively maintained, so thats a good sign at least.
I tried to get siemens solid edge working through wine, but it was mostly broken and I didn't dig too deep into troubleshooting, I just dualboot windows for fussy programs and anticheats
ok but have you used steam? it's so much better than the alternatives. thats most of why people like him and valve
ok but the real interesting stuff like reading hand writing from a paralyzed person imagining writing it and etc are all only for actual electrodes in brains.
I wanna see some even more insane FPV drones. theres always some battery breakthrough though, so I don't wanna get my hopes up.
kinda crazy how much the drone explosions demolish buildings. i guess houses aren't made to be suddenly pressurized
you can spoof wifi networks, too
electric heat strips in an air handler is a common option
Your point makes sense, but an epoxy submersible definitely wouldn't make it down to the titanic intact even once, and there are some ways fibers could be put in tension by compressing the cylinder, so the CF was doing something, its just complicated. They shouldve just built a normal submersible though.
i dunno, too many teenagers have pretty much no concerns about (online) privacy at all
350 nm is massive and ancient relative to new processes, but the name of a new process stopped physically meaning anything a while ago. for instance, the 3 nm process smallest distance between traces is only 24 nm.
now the industry just names a new process when enough techniques for improving performance (without much actual size difference) exist.