You're not willing to be candid about why you posted a negative article about drugs. I presume your reasons are religious or otherwise ideological, and would not be appreciated by the majority of people.
rah
joined 1 year ago
I don't believe I need to know anything presented in this article. I would like to know why the author thinks I need to know lots of dry statistics and speculation but they don't bother to present that bit of information, alas.
OP: why did you post this?
the money will go to nature-based climate solutions, clean energy and electrification of transport, as well as projects that improve agricultural practices and protect biodiversity
Terrible report, doesn't even say the cause of death.
Enterprise only ran for four seasons.
s6e12
Of which show?
The future is here.
I doubt that.
Who on Earth thought there was any adaptation?
the very tone of this thread is suggesting that the HA developers choice in how they distribute their platform is "incorrect"
Not incorrect, just poor engineering. Anti-social ultimately.
you seem to disagree with explanations provided as to why those choices were likely made
I can see only two disagreements in the whole post. Only one of those is about the reasons for creating an OS rather than distro packages. I have corrected a number of factual errors and errors in reasoning but those aren't disagreements.
Dismissing those statements and observations do not make them incorrect.
Yes, my dismissing of them is not what makes them incorrect.
Nothing I stated is dramatic
LOL "this evil developer is doing a sinister thing"
Please don't presume to advise me.