Yeah, the fact that FB messenger uses Signal protocol, means the encryption is better recognized than the one used in Telegram. But the lack of on-by-default or the need to drill in a few options before enabling secret chats.. I mean it’s even named the same thing as Telegram.
quaff
joined 2 years ago
It’s three clicks. And it opens a separate chat from the existing one. It’s obscure enough that you could say the UX deprioritizes (which at best is not an actively malicious design choice) usage of end-to-end encryption.
If Telegram is considered an encrypted messenger, then FB messenger should be too. Works exactly the same. I don’t know about you, but being the same level as FB messenger should speak volumes to whether Telegram is “encrypted” or not 🙄
You should try out https://pcpartpicker.com/
Great tool to spec out a computer and give you an idea of how much it’ll cost you.
Is searching by post planned for 2.0? That’s the only feature I’m missing from Mlem right now 🙏
Neat. But it’s kind of concerning to see yet another OSS project hitch it’s community resourcing to Discord.
Neat. But it’s kind of concerning to see yet another OSS project hitch it’s community resourcing to Discord.
I’ve switched from Quad9 to Mullvad DNS a month ago, and I’ve been noticing some domains aren’t resolving. Domains that shouldn’t be blocked. It feels like Mullvad’s rules are extra restrictive.
The key for me was being told: it’s okay to ride (to hold) the clutch a little before/during/after you’re switching gears.
Are there any updates regarding microphone and Touch ID support in this release?
Are there any updates regarding microphone and Touch ID support in this release?
If you’re talking to 30 people, it’s 90 clicks. It might be 3 clicks if you know where to look, but end of the day, even if you know where to find it, that’s still that many clicks times how many people you chat with. It’s not ideal. I wouldn’t say it’s complicated sure, but it’s not easy.