nekomusumeninaritai

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Whoops, looks like someone forgot to make the base juice class abstract…

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Ooh, cool.

{X|X∉X}∈{X|X∉X}⇐⇒{X|X∉X}∉{X|X∉X} (1)

{X|X∉X}∈{X|X∉X}∧¬{X|X∉X}∈{X|X∉X} (2)

Thence G(me) (2,explosion)

where G(x): x has 1,000,000 bars of gold

Thanks for the gold

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Couldn't a Chromium clone relicensed under some copyleft license also be a viable option against Chromiums? Chromium is licensed under BSD-3 which Wikipedia claims is compatible with the GPL, so there wouldn't be any legal reason this couldn't be done, right? Other than not really wanting to split a project with excessive forks (which is only bad if you think that the Chromium project itself is a net good), is there some technical or other reason why this would be a bad idea?

0
Catgirls, smash the stack (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Accessibility text :Pictured is a slide from a presentation at a hacker conference with a bullet point reading “We can smash the stack” highlighted and the presenter wearing cat ears and holding a plushie fox. Added to the screenshot of the presentation is the aforementiomed highlighting as well as the warning “KEEP YOUR MEMCPY SIZES VALIDATED OR CATGIRLS WILL SMASH THE STACK, NYA” written in a pink all-caps impact-style font clone.

Edit: Meme photo wasn’t visible when the link to the actual talk was in the url field, so I’m moving it here: https://media.ccc.de/v/gpn21-16-breaking-the-black-box-security-coprocessor-in-the-nintendo-switch-a-story-of-vulnerability-after-vulnerability