kogasa

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Pretty sure that movie was terrible with an awesome soundtrack

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Looks just like my old fluff did 10 years ago :)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

It has access to a python interpreter and can use that to do math, but it shows you that this is happening, and it did not when i asked it.

That's not what I meant.

You have access to a dictionary, that doesn’t prove you’re incapable of spelling simple words on your own, like goddamn people what’s with the hate boners for ai around here

??? You just don't understand the difference between a LLM and a chat application using many different tools.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

ChatGPT uses auxiliary models to perform certain tasks like basic math and programming. Your explanation about plausibility is simply wrong.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (4 children)

If you fine tune a LLM on math equations, odds are it won't actually learn how to reliably solve novel problems. Just the same as it won't become a subject matter expert on any topic, but it's a lot harder to write simple math that "looks, but is not, correct" than it is to waffle vaguely about a topic. The idea of a LLM creating a robust model of the semantics of the text it's trained on is, at face value, plausible; it just doesn't seem to actually happen in practice.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

40k breeding forums are usually pretty chill

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Or... the whispers were reported by the other party, or detected by an automatic abuse detection system, they paid off his contract because he was suing them for it and they weren't confident it was a good investment to fight

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago

Well, we knew he was a shitbag beforehand, so that's not really what's in question

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm not a physicist, I don't know one way or another. But it's possible that there's a leading explanation for the formation of the universe based on a mathematical model that predicts exactly one big bang.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Based on the comment you're replying to, I assume they would say "no, nothing materialized from nothing because there wasn't a 'before' in which nothing could have existed"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

It wouldn't have been published, and he's only relatively famous if you're a topologist, but it was Charlie Frohman. Not that it must carry the same weight for you, but I value his insight highly, even if it's just a quip.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but it proves that termwise comparison with the harmonic series isn't sufficient to tell if a series diverges.

view more: ‹ prev next ›