dsilverz

It's a concept I've been thinking about for months or even years, the concept of non-existence. In my mind I can sorta visualize it, but I'm not able to transcribe it to words, I'm not able to start explaining it because whenever I try to start writing something, it starts morphing into existence. For example: a phrase I can think of is "Light needs a darkness to shine unto", it sounds like it can describe the concept, but then science comes out of nowhere to slap me in my face with the understanding of how matter emits radiation and how there's no such place as "completely absent from any radiation".

In my mind, the complementary makes sense, substance needs substrate which needs the substance, light needs darkness which needs the light, Hadit needs Nuith which needs Hadit (the infinitesimal point needs the infinite circumference which needs the infinitesimal point), and so on. See, human language is made to conceptualize what can be conceptualized, and non-existence is not conceptualizable in essence. However, the existence needs a counterpoint, a counterpart, something to contrast with its conceptualization, because if there was only existence, there'd be no existence at all (how can we conceptualize a thing if it's the only thing wherever you look, wherever you go?). We can conceptualize the fabric of spacetime because "it's there" and, by "there", I mean "there" as in "where the fabric of spacetime sits on", just like the shine of a spotlight illuminating a place where it was shadowy and dark.

There are things that we do know, there are things that we don't know yet but we can know, and there are things that can't be known. Who is the first Sumer person to ever write, what was his name, when he/she was born and when he/she died? What about the person who discovered the fire, who exactly were he/she? We don't know, we can't know, but they existed because now we have fire and writing systems. The impossibility of determining them doesn't rule them out of existence, just like the non-existence itself. I mean, it's the very essence of the non-existence to "don't exist" but that somehow makes it "existent", somehow the state of non-existence is a state, therefore, it exists as a state of being (as in "not being").

To make matters worse, the human language is made to describe things within the realm of existence, time and space, when and where, while transcendental concepts can't really be described through it without losing its transcendental essence. Non-existence is such a concept, a non-conceptualizable concept, so paradoxical in its nature.

Internet Archive (sued by publishers, then sued by music labels), now Wikipedia being sued... I'm just saying... Sounds like there's a declared war against historical archives and freedom of information.

Pighe N Tear Cheo Htel

In Brazil we officially call it something like "National Enabling Card" (here I'm translating "Carteira Nacional de Habilitação", CNH, in a literal way). By joining the meanings from words "Carteira" and "Habilitação", it takes the meaning of "license". But here's the catch: while the English part of CNH is "Driver License", the original Portuguese name doesn't mention the "motorista" (i.e. the driver). It'd be something like "National License", focusing more on the collective (nation) instead of who is actually being licensed (the driver, the individual, the citizen).

Edit: I noticed that your map is wrong for Brazil. The Brazilian CNH (the newer models) has "Driver License", not "Driving License", among the international languages below the original Portuguese title for the document: English, Spanish and French.

Exactly the same applies to Portuguese: Janeiro, Fevereiro, Março, Abril, Maio, Junho, Julho, Agosto, Setembro, Outubro, Novembro, Dezembro. Only the names for days of week are different here: Domingo (Sunday), segunda-feira, terça-feira, quarta-feira, quinta-feira, sexta-feira and sábado. Colloquially (at least here in Brazil) we omit the "feira" suffix, saying just "quarta" or "segunda".

Curious to see how the peaks aren't specifically for a country, but for a region. The tallest peaks within Brazilian territory geographically correspond to São Paulo (actually, Sao Paulo's neighboring region including Guarulhos as well as Campinas) and Rio de Janeiro. Between them it's possible to see a smaller peak, it's probably Belo Horizonte. The peak below is probably Curitiba. There are peaks on the northeast corresponding to Northeastern capitals, such as Salvador, Fortaleza and Natal. The Brazilian north and middle-west are sparsely populated. So, in a sense, the indicators are specifically placed within the map, corresponding not just to countries, but accounting for local demographics as well. Nice.

I'm not autist, but I was diagnosed with some degree of Borderline and Schizotypal personality disorders. I used to believe in many conspiracy theories. I gave up on the majority of them since 2023, when I left Christianity and became Luciferian (not exactly "Luciferian" but it's the closest label to my "religion" nowadays, which is no specific religion).

From my experience since the Orkut times among conspiracy theorists, I'd point out many factors that would lead people to "conspiracy theories":

• Mistrust of governments, corporations and institutions: public trust can be severely damaged when leaders and brands make mistakes, some people will overreact on those mistakes, leading to conspiracy theories.
• Lack of sufficient transparency and freedom of information among researches and public policies: paywalling/university-walling scientific papers (ResearchGate was one of those platforms where I remember being paywalled), things that everyone should be able to read independently of socioeconomic status or educational formation, don't help on the fight against misinformation and disinformation.
• Religion: while I'm myself "almost-religious", generally the esoteric and occult religions don't have the same behavior than Christianity where there's a strong belief on "we are saints, everything else is Satan", "it's us versus demons". I was once a Christian so I'm not saying that to attack Christianity, but because I experienced it myself.
• Human need for social belonging: it's an intrinsic behavior of humans as a social species. We want to "belong", we want to meet people that'd approve us. Since the hominin times, humans kind of need other humans for defending themselves against potential predators, then humans organized themselves in tribes. In a nutshell (oversimplifiedly speaking), tribes grew up, villages emerged, then towns, then cities, then countries... Globalization allowed the "grown tribes" to connect to each other, facing different lifestyles, different cultures, different beliefs. The internet allowed for real-time interaction with different cultures, yet our very deep instincts are from those fragile hominins having to decide whether to fight or flight when facing snakes and wolves and jaguars. So it's a survival instinct, to be part of a social group, to belong, to survive. Conspiracy theorist groups are no different. In the end, everyone wants to belong, and people that don't like/don't trust the status quo are left with conspiracy theorist groups.

Maybe I'm wrong on my analysis, but I'm open for counterpoints.

Ave Cæesar, ave memervm imperivm!

O maior dos exportadores de memes está no hemisfério sul.

It seems like alarms can trigger Google Assistant routines. Alarm sounds can either use local ringtones or YouTube Music. These things, Google Assistant and YouTube Music, they are cloud services. I imagine that the clock's privacy policy is there due to the usage of these cloud services (along with the rule from Play Store that requires every app to have a privacy policy).

I'm sure lots of Russians were already angry with their government way before the sanctions, so what now? Ideally, people could do massive protests, Putin would be scared as heck so he renounces, people invoke the good old democracy again, they vote, a new leader takes place, Ukraine-Russia war would cease, both Russians and Ukrainians would happily fly together mounted in winged unicorns... Except everyone knows it doesn't work that way!! Governments (not just Putin's) have multiple ways to fight any protests going inside their country, governments can tear gas citizens, governments can end lives from their own citizens, governments can end a protest before it even happens through censorship and massive electrical/internet blackouts. Even when citizens has guns, governments have stronger guns. Lots of recent examples are there to demonstrate how this happens.

People from a sanctioned people can and will starve and die, because their governments and their bureaucrats and forces (police and army) can have their own sustenance, so it doesn't really matter for them if their own citizens starve to death. Russia, China, Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, they won't change simply because population became angry: I guess everyone in the west remember the Tiananmen Square, did it change China's government? I guess no.

So instead of sanctioning and indirectly punishing the people, one option would be that organizations (maybe Red Cross, UN, I dunno) could intervene silently and peacefully inside a country, helping people to flee their country to a safer place, effectively reducing that country army's recruitment potential and weakening its military power (did anybody from NATO, WEF, UN, or whatever organizations, even thought about this, helping Russians flee away from Russia in order to weaken Russia's military?).

It's worth remembering that military recruitment is often a mandatory thing, and the only way common people can run away from it is running away from the country, something that won't happen if they have no money to start emigration processes (it costs money, you know, it's not a free thing, even seeking political asylum needs money). Cutting money will only cut lives unrelated to the leaders that are carrying wars (and I'm sure Putin won't cry because Ms. Mary Marylovski died from starvation because US and Europe indirectly cut her income, because Ms. Mary Marylovski is another unknown citizen to Putin or other higher level government bureaucrats).

I digressed from technology here, but those are my thoughts on the matter.

Indirectly common people are being seized from their humanity. I guess the disliking people know how immigration is not something freely accessible, lots of people around the world just don't have the necessary conditions to leave the country where they were born against their own consent, be it Russia or whatever other country.