crystenn

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 140 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Revenue doesn't equal profit. Apple's 2023 net profit was 96b, so a 14b fine is a substantial portion of their overall profits (~15%).

Of course, they're not hurting by any stretch of the imagination, 82b is still a STUPID amount of money, but we should be getting the facts and numbers correct

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

figure out how far up before you stop washing your face

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Not true. Check my other comment on this thread where I talked about my experience with 3rd party USB-C cables

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Sure, but whether they were forced to move over or did it out of the (non-existent) goodwill of their hearts wasn't the point of contention in the discussion and results in a similar outcome. The initial commenter pointed out that they couldn't share a charger and I just mentioned that this should be a non-issue once lightning is phased out.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Gotcha. It could be entirely possible that the anecdotal experiences regarding phone data that you've heard could be simply because they're heavier users or that they purchased a smaller quota. From personal experience, I really have not noticed any background processes that suck up data.

Regarding the type-C cable though, I have actually experienced that problem where cheaper cables do not work for charging. This part is PURE SPECULATION on my end, but I suspect Apple stops cheaper cables from charging on the off chance that it increase the risk of a fire (cheap cables = thinner wires = more resistance = more heat) because when stuff like that makes the news, the headline is typically "iPhone caught fire while charging" and not "Cheap cable caused a fire." I spent a lil more on a third party USB-C cable that was higher quality and rated to charge up to 65W and have had no problems with it. I'm not sure what the economic situation is in Latin America, but where I am (Malaysia), I spent about RM60 (which is roughly equivalent to $13) on the cable that worked compared to RM20 for the cable that didn't, just to give you a point of reference.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (9 children)

The first paragraph, I can get along with and understand where you're coming from.

The second paragraph, could you elaborate what you mean by "eat up your phone plan just by existing"? I personally use an iPhone and have had very normal data usage rates that is accurately tracked through both the phone and my carrier's app.

Also regarding borrowing a charger, they just moved to USB-C so that will be a non-issue a few years down the road when lightning is phased out.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

actually me way back in high school. i had heard about bitcoin and went "ooh what an interesting way to make money" set up the miner and opened a wallet and everything, never mined and forgot about it. fast forward to the crypto boom 10 years later and i was sad

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

that's just straight up inaccurate information. bluetooth low energy has a data rate of 2mbps, which was introduced with bluetooth 5. regular bluetooth 5 has a 50mbps bandwidth based on a very cursory google search

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

you're talking about a bandwidth cap, not a data cap. data caps are when you get throttled after downloading a certain amount of data or get charged extra. think phone data plans where you have 10 or 20gb or whatever per month

view more: next ›