You're right, and I don't want you to feel like no-one agrees with you.
chumbalumber
joined 1 year ago
I think you're missing the point of the original comment. Describing modern conservatism as a disability at once absolves conservatives of their responsibility not to hold abhorrent views, by classing it as a characteristic they have no control over, and lumps people with disabilities into a group that, in a non-insignificant number of cases, wants them dead or sterilised.
That's why the commenter was upset with you; not because you've criticised eugenics, but because you've been massively insensitive, and when someone pointed out that insensitivity you became defensive and attacked them in return.
I reckon i could have a stab at Xhosan, but only because I've watched so much Xhosan rugby commentary (the passion they have for their team is absolutely infectious and carries a game: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KPpVLIpt9eg&pp=ygUWeGhvc2EgcnVnYnkgY29tbWVudGFyeQ%3D%3D)
:)
Looks ai generated, so not too surprised it's wrong
What do you think is in the beans??
Eh, rabbit could be cis. Up to rabbit to tell us how they identify. Sometimes men like to look pretty too :3
Also surgery. But we're capable of knowing which homonym is meant by context ;)
Eh, you wouldn't use the noun water to refer to atoms of water. 'How many waters are there?' to refer to atoms of water is the statement of someone deranged
And yet you opened the image they sent 🤨📸
view more: next ›
oh look. it's the brave little cis boy