biscuitswalrus

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is more autism than adhd and it's a huge value of autistic people to reflect a "normal" attitude as absurdity.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago

Your comment seems like a rational response to me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

After you boil them, is mashing them preferable? Or does that ruin the whole thing?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Ps if you want to be scared, look up showdan. Maybe look at showdan YouTube examples.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I trust Steve Gibson and I have listened to his podcast for years. Without trust, his tool does no more than what any other internet citizen can do, so even if you don't trust it, it's a trial by gentle fire.

Personally I recommend listening to security now podcast. But then again I've worked in IT for 15 years so it's kind of my thing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

What a great post.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

Good post, nothing else I have to add though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Hey I don't know your technical capability, but Steve Gibson pointed out the lowest knowledge way to get an isolated network just by buying two more cheap NAT routers. Your current router stays routing internet, but in LAN1 you plug in one of the new routers, let's call it your home network, and LAN2 of your internet router plug in the other router and call it insecure. Plug in your WiFi access points into home and your devices. Plug in work laptop and other IoT to insecure. Home won't be able to talk to insecure, and insecure can't talk to home. This is all because of NAT. Just make sure the home network range is a different range to the insecure.

Otherwise it's just a vlan on router and switches and access points with no firewall rules that allow INSECURE to HOME.

You might already know all this in which case never mind!

https://www.grc.com/nat/nat.htm

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

Well that was terrible.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

By your definition I should be called a footballer because I play football once a week casually. Ignore the 50 plus hour weeks of my actual job. I got $50 from football as season champions (it's a gift card, for the bar, at the place I play). I better go update my linkedin!

You're funny, good one.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I thought this was an onion article.

view more: next ›