Like with spam and its basically zero conversion rate, yes. But I've seems to remain clear of it in the tags I follow. So far.
beejjorgensen
When I see this kind of thing, I think, "Screw that. I want to listen to real people." But then I wonder if that's because I'm GenX shaking my fist at cloud and in the future will this become normalized or even demanded?
I just hope that the fediverse stays small enough to remain an undesirable target for AI slop mongers.
Most of my code and some non-code is under ~/src
, but I have repos scattered all around for other things.
I don't care what they do as long as they do it over there.
I think the difference is scale. Before it was x% of humanity making shitting opinions where x < 100. Now it's x% of humanity+AI, where x is, say, 100,000% of humanity. I don't think we're currently equipped to separate the wheat from that much chaff.
I'd say it's more intolerably long copyright terms than the DMCA specifically.
I say there's a good chance Trump deliberately did not submit a statement just to get this to happen.
Yes, it is. I just need to know that the passkeys are in that file and that all the apps I use to read that file support them.
I don't entirely disagree, but I think defining much of that in effective legal terms is going to be virtually impossible. And I'm super-wary of anything that says someone can't link to something.
Just be careful how you do it. The First Amendment gives a lot of leeway for people to be shitty.
Should have stayed on until musk booted them. Missed opportunity. Also X needs more counter-content, not less.