barsoap

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Iran didn't turn tribal and is still diverse AF. Don't confuse the people and overall culture with the backwards government which isn't exactly popular.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Iran only really fits half into the latter category because the people are vastly more liberal than their government.

And if you look at polls (can't find them right now sorry) Iran is actually one of the least Muslim Muslim countries around when you drill down into dogma, e.g. belief in heaven, belief in angels, such things. The average Iranian is about as Muslim in their private faith as someone believing in reincarnation is Christian.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

and questionable things regarding immigration laws

I mean... there have been some regrettable cases in Germany directly after the law declaring foreign sub-18 marriage to be invalid, like 16/18yold asylum seeker couples getting separated. There's a difference between saying "we don't recognise that, you'll have to marry again under German law" and "we're putting you in two different accommodations in two different states because you can't possibly be a family unit and that's how the dice fell". You can't just blindly assume they're not heads over heels for each other, no matter how arranged and young the marriage was, you have to look at the individual case and if everything checks out treat them eg. analogous to siblings when it comes to accommodation.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

The phase-out practically already started in the early 90s, latest when it became abundantly clear that building more reactors was not politically feasible.

The reason is distrust in anything being handled properly. See Asse (they just discovered irradiated water that they don't have any idea how it came to be because it's actually above the deposit), see plants running without functioning backup generators for decades, the list is endless.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago

IIRC according to the original plan the last coal plants would've shut down before the last nuclear plants. Certainly would've been possible without 16 years of CDU government.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

How much of that is due to French nuclear reactors shutting down, both during summer (to not turn the rivers that cool them into fish soup) as well as all that maintenance stuff they had going on lately.

Germany is an electricity exporter.

Also: You're looking at generated power. Not coal consumption. That doesn't completely erase the bump but it's quite a bit smaller, they shut down some very old plants and replaced them with more efficient ones.

The current biggest chunk is oil, mostly used in transportation, and gas, for heating. Those will need to be electrified and replaced with what 25% of their Joule-value in electricity production, gas will stay longest because it's used for peaker plants and, once the grid is completely renewable, that will be done with synthesised gas.

Had the original plan to phase out nuclear and coal been followed we'd already be there but the CDU insisted on knee-capping renewables because the likes of RWE were asleep at the wheel and hadn't shifted their investments fast enough, electricity production in Germany suddenly wasn't an oligopoly, any more, can't have that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I'm mostly just sad when that happens. People do tend to consider me intimidating, but only very rarely scary, just as a roller-coaster might be intimidating but it's not going to jump at you and strap you in so there's no reason to fear it. On the contrary, I do tend to make people feel safe. Which then leads me to believe that those few people who actually are scared by my presence have completely fucked threat radars.

Then, OTOH, if you're suppressing any urges to jump at people and strapping them in and looping them around yep people are going to notice that. You might not actually be doing it, ever, but the possibility is there and you're going to be perceived differently, suppressed aggression is still visible in body language and at least their subconscious is going to pick up on it. People are going to be scared, at least a bit on edge, even if their threat radars aren't fucked.

If your first thought is to be seriously angry at someone for not trusting a stranger, to me, that pretty much proves them right.

Nah they're angry at themselves for not being at peace with themselves and projecting outwards, just as pretty much everyone else. SNAFU.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

3d not being required makes a hell a lot of sense and of course it wasn't people have been drafting on paper for ages. They might've ended up on Mac or maybe Amiga, but an SGI workstation is quite an investment when you don't even need to spin polygons. IRIS GL dates back to the early 80s, doesn't seem so much to be a timeline but price and need thing. And it's not like you can't have a 3d view without acceleration, just would take a while to render and a frame every five seconds might still be usable.

There apparently was an IRIX version at one time but with no user base preference, more likely they were thinking "where's my C: drive" so once 3d acceleration hit the mainstream everyone happily switched back to Microsoft. Meanwhile you have 3d artists complaining that they can't move windows with meta+lmb on windows.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I mean back in the days they should have been running on IRIX, and SGI switched over to Linux when they made the switch to x86 CPUs. Plenty of movie studios switched over to Linux workstations because of that, porting from IRIX to Linux is trivial compared to porting to Windows, why didn't the same happen with CAD?

Wintel-PCs for the longest time just weren't suitable for 3d work, they were office machines.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

AutoCAD

It's always funny with 3d. Graphics? You need Houdini? Of course it runs on Linux, it's a UNIX-native program after all, first version ran on IRIX because what else would you use for 3d work but an SGI workstation and Linux is the commercial successor to IRIX. Blender, the same, just 5k bucks cheaper (and not everything is nodes, not yet). CAD? Everything's suddenly windows-only because... how the hell did that came to be? Were they running 1990's CAD software on Excel machines?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

OpenEXR. Though it probably could use a spec upgrade, in particular add JPEG-XL to the list of compression algorithms. It's not like OpenEXR's choices are bad, the lossy ones are just more geared towards fidelity than space savings, kind of the opposite of what you want for the web where saving space is often paramount and fidelity a bonus.

Bonus: Supports multi-channel, so not just RGBA. Not terribly useful for your run off the mill camera, very useful in production where you might want to attach the depth buffer, cryptomatte etc and I guess you could also use it for the output of light field cameras. Oh there's also multi-view so you can store not just stereo images but also whole all-around captures and stuff. There's practically nothing pixel-related you can't do with it though it might require custom tooling.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 days ago (2 children)

...in Teheran, while the rest of the country was pretty much still tribal.

While it's absolutely true that the average Iranian is vastly, vastly more liberal than their government let's not turn around and glorify the Shah regime either. You don't need to go back in time to show Iranians in a positive light.

view more: ‹ prev next ›