Shimitar

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

A locked bootloader looks for official ROM signatures, which a custom ROM doesn't have.

That's why this is impossible. You can hard-brick your phone, that's why LineageOS doesn't allow you to relock.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

These blog posts might seems a bit nahive, but making fun of them is not nice.

I still appreciated reading them and the raised some questions in me, even if maybe not the ones the author was aiming for.

Still interesting.

Whats wrong with people just criticizing everything around here? Are we getting toxic like "the other site"?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

LineageOS stock

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Not a bad take per-se, but a bit condescending. While I agree and like the KISS paradigm, remember that no solution works at a lower complexity level of the problem itself.

So, define your problem clearly, find the simplest possible solution. Don't overcomplicate, I agree, but don't be fooled by false hopes.

Is it really simpler? Yes. Will it scale if I need it to? Maybe not, but will I really need for it to scale?

And so on.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I installed from fdroid, I expect it to be still available as far as it will work...

And I guess somebody will build and keep publishing it just not on google play, which is anyway a cesspool nowadays, so no big deal.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Nope!

Just wasted 3 days debugging an IP assigned to two devices... Not fun, don't do it...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

I think that proposing immich for every use case out there is not the correct answer.

As much as I like immich, this is not a good use case... iMHO.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

All that? Well, I understand your point, but honestly I have more fun learning something new, and was really little work.

Anyway... Its an option too

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

No you don't need two: in fact I have only unbound setup to do everything with one piece of software.

Better or worse? No idea, but it works and its one less piece that might fail.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

I have a quite rich selfhosted stack, and DNS is indeed part of it.

For such a critical piece of infrastructure I didn't needed a container, just installed Unbound and did some setup for ad blocking and internal DNS rules.

Here my setup: https://wiki.gardiol.org/doku.php?id=router:dhcp-dns

You could go with an independent pihole maybe, but that would double the chances of a hardware failure...

Using one device for everything might seem risky, but actually has less chances of failure ;)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

That's not the point. Maybe you can, but for how long? you will never stop asking the question with docker...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think you wrote it back ways: transitioned from docker to podman?

Yeah podman should use quadlets, not compose, but still works just fine with docker compose and the podman socket!

view more: ‹ prev next ›