SapphironZA

joined 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 months ago (9 children)

They do! It's like they never heard of EFTs. They also pay many of their bills manually, or even worse, some still mail a cheque in response to a bill they receive via snail mail.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Not strictly true. Firefox gets inferior support from cloud services, like Microsoft. Newer versions of their Web apps are not available on Firefox.

But there should be no downside. It's all artificial.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Ellen Ripley, no contest.

No superpowers, no special training, no special technology. Simply the wisdom to see a job that needs done and the bravery and determination to do it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Another vote for nextcloud.

Or synchthing if you want something that is serverless, but does not support sync on demand.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

God has been doing a shit job. Time to fire him.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Exactly, that lady who invented COBOL is probably responsible for more deaths than any of the serial killers in the list.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

And moist, lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

This is similar to the seat size problem.

Maybe standard seats should be bigger (and cost more) , with some option for smaller seats

You can then invite people to get on a scale to see if they qualify for a cheaper seat.

I a big tall person and I always feel sorry for the tiny people having to fly tucked in my armpit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Maybe heavier cars and vehicles should have a lower speed limit then.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 7 months ago (15 children)

Maybe car sales taxes should scale by vehicle weight.

If you consume more of the road, you pay more

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Exactly the point I was going to make, but much better explained.

view more: next ›