Lininop

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
  1. Is wasn't mine

  2. You're trying to hard to see what you want to see in order to sound morally superior for Internet high fives.

It is clearly a half assed joke saying that if you call a group horrible, someone with get butt hurt and respond accordingly. Which in a round about way is exactly what you did. Any further reading into it is on you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I can't believe it actually worked lol

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree with you that prohibition isn't the way to do things. In my opinion the war on drugs is a waste of tax payers money and more importantly human life stuck behind bars. If you are speaking against criminalization of substances I'm with you. I'm however, not against harm reduction and education, including warning labels on products that are harmful.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Sure I'll establish it with in context. Just because "other things are also dangerous" doesn't mean warning should not be on the label of a known carcinogen. This is coming from someone who drinks more than he should.

Putting a warning on the label of a product known to cause harm isn't "controlling others". You are free to still consume the product. It is allowing you to make an informed choice, even if you are unaware or unable to access that information from other sources.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Slippery slope fallacy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure you can even have one without the other tbh

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've had better luck with the Connect app