Endward23

joined 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I quoted the article in order to comment:

One company is aiming to treat infections with a different strategy: arming tiny viruses called bacteriophages with Crispr.

I checked it just out: CRISPR is already part of the intra-celluar immun system of baacterias and archaea.

Whereas antibiotics kill bacteria indiscriminately—including the beneficial kind—phages have evolved to be selective in the strains or species of bacteria they target.

So, the phages would not attacke the "good" bacteria within the stomach but the evil ones. Could be a great idea.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I believe it’s a much more complex topic than that.

I think, most likely, you overestimated the consideration of the majority. I may be wrong, though. Most opinion I read or heard about are more emotional drived.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I have googled it and I just found this report here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Signal is offering the most accessible e2ee messenger right now.

Doesn't matter. In the reach of EU, some law about Chat Control. If they make this into law, no provider within the EU will have a choice in this matter.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

And the majority thinks this way for what reason?

Because "Fake News" and missinformation has been framded as a danger for our societies for a long time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Telegram has been banned in Russia, as far as I heared.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (8 children)

If you don't care for the guy, you will nearly certainly lose privat messaging in Europe. Maybe, it's even too late by now.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Is there somebody with more knowledge about the matter who could explain the algorithmus to me?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Back in 2016, MS was advertising Customer Lockbox as an answer to gov’t intrusion into customer privacy.

Got it. Sorry for the missunderstanding.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Respectfully, you are delusional.

Sorry, but your are just, bold wrong. The so called "capitalist world" has by far the greates wealth and possibilities than any other area of the world. And perhaps that partly caused the drop of birthrates world wide.

The idea that bad conditions let birth rates drop is straight up false. The idea will be disproved by the fact that some of the most poor regions of the world have still high birth rates.

Maybe, the problem is far more sophisticated and all, but many things around there are wishful thinking.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

I really wonder how long X aka Twitter can operate within the EU. The EU is on a smiliar tracetion in my opinion.

 

This thread is for a open discussion of the named question.

Do you believe that miningoperation on asteroids are possible? Or not? Why?

 

Does anyone has an idea what happend to the "Anonymous Remailer".

Some years ago, there was an active scene of remailers in order to post anonym into the UseNet or send mails without a sender.

As far as I know, there have even been technical solutions to problems like finding out whether someone is writing something based on traffic. I remember that there were even concepts for a kind of mailing list that worked in principle while respecting privacy.

Has this been developed further?

 

From the Article: "The physician-patient conversation is a cornerstone of medicine, in which skilled and intentional communication drives diagnosis, management, empathy and trust. AI systems capable of such diagnostic dialogues could increase availability, accessibility, quality and consistency of care by being useful conversational partners to clinicians and patients alike"

What do you say? Do you think its even possble? Could it rise privacy problems?

 

What do you think about the new EU AI Act?

 

I make a citation of the article. QUOTE: "But a new study1 that tracks proteins suggests that these changes aren’t uniform: an individual’s organs can age at different rates, and a given organ can age at a faster rate in one person than in another with the same chronological age." ENDQUOTE

What do you think about this? Do you believe the may solved this problem with the pattern recognition of AI?

view more: next ›