EMPig

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I think it's photosynthesis. 'Bury in the ground' is an extreme simplification btw. Also, I am finished with this topic scince long anough. It feels politically biased. If you'd like to reply, I'd hear it gladly. But I m not going to be involved into a discussion.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

I'd rather fill land with trees than with radioactive wastes.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Read about breathing if you want to know how to capture gas. Also, about photosynthesis.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

"Easier"? Are you aware of the fact that radioactive waste tombs are meant to stand for millions of years? It requres a lot of territory, construction and servance charges, and lots of prays for nothing destructive happens with it in its "infinite" lifetime.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (17 children)

And what do YOU know about radioactive waste disposal?