CurlyWurlies4All

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Yeah sometimes things just have a natural shelf life.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Watched a lot of Binging With Babish and just got tired of his schtick I think. Same with the How To Drink guy.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago

Matthew 17:20, NIV He replied, “Because you have so little faith. Truly I tell you, if you have faith as small as a mustard seed, you can say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there,’ and it will move. Nothing will be impossible for you.”

I was raised Evangelical and yeah, my parents took that literally.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I remember a little while back reading something about how Financial Literacy was introduced as a way for the banks to avoid regulation, pushing the responsibility to individuals rather than face government pressure to change.

I'll have to look for the article...

EDIT: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1198&context=faculty_scholarship

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In most places under the American empire's control to varying degrees.*

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I don't see them as any different to cigarettes personally. Just one more way for giant corporations to get people hooked on addictive shit with no upside. Fuck Jool. Fuck Philip Morris.

These companies spend millions knowingly breaking the law over and over and then get to keep operating regardless? Their executives should be in prison.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yep and in order for these companies to grow they must continue to increase the volume of ads being shown, which only makes them less effective, which they try and counter by making them ever more invasive.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

Yeah it's a good book. It's a cycle that this issue surfaces every couple of years where someone does a study, finds that the numbers they're given don't match their own analysis and the ad tech platform does some PR to paper over the story.

Most people selling ads are just like the real estate agents in The Big Short. The media people make their money via rebate from the platforms by guaranteeing a certain volume of spend so they have no incentive to be putting hard questions to the platforms and the client is reliant on seeing the data which is provided by the platform with no third parties able to provide any level of transparency.

Money goes into Google, Amazon and Meta's black boxes which spit out numbers. The agency people copy and paste the figures into a presentation and everyone congratulates each other for a job well done.

[–] [email protected] 169 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (13 children)

The cost of digital advertising cannot be justified by its effectiveness (or rather lack there of). We've collectively spent hundreds of billions of dollars creating the infrastructure for invasive hyper targeted ads that do not get better results than simple billboards and terrestrial TV ads even now. We've created a global economy of marketing, media, advertising and sales solely reliant on technofeudalist overlords who've provided very little actual improvement of anything.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

My team moved to fully remote a month ago. I'm loving it so far.

Getting to see my little girl throughout my day makes me feel like I'm not missing out on watching her grow up.

view more: ‹ prev next ›