Which is inherently discriminatory. Especially when their lawyers have absolutely told their executives that and they could care less.
ComradeSalad
joined 2 years ago
The main issue is the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It’s illegal for employers to discriminate on the basis of race, which includes only hiring one race. Imagine the logic if a company said that they only want white employees because there would be less of a culture gap. I assume your reaction would not be positive. That’s a core reason why that law was passed.
The US isn’t making inefficient requests. Those are the laws that every company has to deal with. Unless the companies lawyers were born yesterday, they are also very well aware of this.
No one changed the deal. This has been the law for almost 80 years. Basic research would have told you everything in saying. Stop making excuses for a capitalist corporation.
Thank you for looking, and I can definitely take a look that book!
Thank you! Also that's an amazing speech, and I'm definitely keeping it in my back pocket for the next time a liberal claims Lenin was antisemitic.
So they’re going to use up their last available reserves in a desperate and pointless assault whereafter they still get curbstomped by their opponent who still maintains air superiority and controls large amounts of armoured reserves?
Sounds about right.
They just voted to end the strike and the agreement did not restore their pensions.
I love rats, but that feels oddly mean : (
Apparently at least two people did. I say anything; instant downvotes.
Don’t know why I bother anymore.
Have a good week too Oppo : )
Why do I bother saying anything. Nowhere did I say Harris wouldn’t do that either.
But he has explicitly stated that that was one of his goals. Harris sending more weapons to Israel isn’t her asking Netenyahu to draw up invasion plans of the west banks.
The wiki page lists hell of a lot more countries then those in the 5 Eyes. Unless I missed Nigerias acceptance ceremony.
It’s just a basic Masters course…