Kind of. If anybody signs up for that premium lite they're fools.
Bongles
Then you haven't been watching. These things have come from HIS mouth.
I get it if you haven't. Lots of people wrote this election off 2 years ago and didn't want to hear it. A friend of mine simply thinks democrats didn't help the economy and doesn't keep up with anything political. So SHE ignores that he's genuinely a rapist and gets offended when people claim she's supporting one. She thinks it's a lot of fear mongering (which certainly exists). Based on polls that I saw, this is basically how a lot of these people voted - for "economy" reasons.
Interesting, Rao's became my favorite brand of jar sauce once I tried them. I wonder if the difference is mostly the sugar content. Expensive though.
Are you an illegal immigrant or otherwise ineligible to vote? How else would you be proving him right?
Imagine the single bar in that town, the night after 3 people voted Democrat and 3 voted Republican.
Could be, but once you start involving genetic engineering, you probably can also just heal the Pokémon.
You'd think so, but they don't even make their Wednesday through wages, let alone Tuesday.
For what it's worth
"Recent comments at Ignite about Windows 10 are reflective of the way Windows will be delivered as a service bringing new innovations and updates in an ongoing manner, with continuous value for our consumer and business customers," says a Microsoft spokesperson in a statement to The Verge. "We aren’t speaking to future branding at this time, but customers can be confident Windows 10 will remain up-to-date and power a variety of devices from PCs to phones to Surface Hub to HoloLens and Xbox. We look forward to a long future of Windows innovations."
https://www.theverge.com/2015/5/7/8568473/windows-10-last-version-of-windows
What stops them from just saying what people want to hear, then doing what their party wants? There's no accountability because you wouldn't know that the party that lied last election is saying the same thing this election.
Current Lemmy will circlejerk about the end of any company or product with the smallest nudge.
Every slightly negative post above a certain threshold of views will have comments about abandoning whatever thing it's about.
There's different teams doing different types of work.
Like the claim system might have it setup so X codes in Y situations can't be automated. Then someone looks at the claim, determines based on their written guidelines that this one needs to be reviewed so they look to see if there are notes attached. If there aren't they request the notes, maybe by sending a letter. If there are, they send it to the team that reviews notes and makes these decisions. Those people probably also have written guidelines on what is allowed or not and if it's more complicated they (should) have someone qualified that can review it. Then the claim is probably sent back to the other team saying "Hey, deny that code and allow this code", where they then just do whatever that says.
They probably also have situations where X code in Y situation is "never" allowed and the first people reviewing it just always deny it. Then, as mentioned elsewhere here, the provider has to resubmit it and then it's allowed on "appeal" by another team. This brother you mentioned is probably doing very little decision making beyond applying already decided guidelines to each claim, if he even processes them.
Nope. His major companies rely on government funding and regulation, and now he's going to be whatever it was called for Trump. A cool 44 billion to actually control parts of government?