this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
35 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

39266 readers
202 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello everyone, I've been thinking about this for a bit and am looking for opinions/alternatives.

Essentially, I'd like to encrypt my shares (NFS/Samba) on my local network. I'm awake that Kerberos is a good option with NFS, but I was hoping for something simpler. The other idea I have right now is to use stunnel with NFSv3/Samba to encrypt my traffic but I don't know if this is a good idea.

How are you doing it? What do you suggest?

Thanks!

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

I'd like this to be used as a share between my NAS and media server.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe you can experiment Croc if you want simplest way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I would like this for my media server, basically like a drop-in replacement for NFS shares. I still need it to be some sort of share instead of having to prompt it to send media across. Great project though, thanks

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

my pleasure..

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (3 children)

NFS over WireGuard is probably going to be the best when it comes to encrypted file shares without the need to set up Kerberos. Just set up the WireGuard tunnel and export over those ips.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

I never thought of using nfs over wireguard. Very nice.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is a pretty good idea. Thanks

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No problem. It should be wayyy faster than sshfs for the record. Both NFS and WireGuard are best in class tools.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

That is wonderful to know

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Is sshfs an option? Unfortunately, I don't think you can put that into /etc/fstab, though...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Would this be an ideal solution to share media from the NAS to the media server?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Dunno about ideal, but it should work.

It does have quite a bit of overhead, meaning it's not the fastest out there, but as long as it's fast enough to serve the media you need, that shouldn't matter.

Also, you need to either mount it manually on the command line whenever you need it or be comfortable with leaving your SSH private key in your media server unencrypted. Since you are already concerned with needing to encrypt file share access even in the local network, the latter might not be a good option to you.

The good part about it is, as long as you can ssh from your media server to your NAS, this should just work with no additional setup needed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Thanks, I'll think more on this

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Interesting. Though it does seem to to require your private key to be unencrypted...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well passwordless. But you can put it on an encrypted partition.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Well passwordless.

Same thing in this context. But sure, an encrypted partition would work.