this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
74 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5380 readers
675 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 hours ago

von der Leyen's sycophancy is the most worrying part of the article, even as individual EU countries, German minister quote, suggests resistance.

EU already signed significant O&G long term contracts after Ukraine war. Even as they are reducing NG and coal electricity by 10% this year, and on path for another 10% every next year, longer term supply lock ins is certain to slow that progress in addition to promoting more global/US development.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The EU is capable of resisting Trump pretty well. However many countries are not. That is honesty the real problem here.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Short term, the countries that can’t say no, will say yes. However, they will seek alternative markets for purchase and sale. It damages the relationship for short term gain, all paid by the business and American consumer.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago

and long term the higher oil and gas consumption is going to damage the climate even worse...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck Trump and the horse he rode in on (Musk), but he is doing wonders for UK/EU relations.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

Lol, he's part of the cabal that pushed for Brexit. One step forward in reaction to two steps back is not to his credit.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Further proof he doesn't even know what the word means

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I'd be surprised if he could spell his own name at this point.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is the most Putin sounding shit I ever read

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

It's just a bad move and stupid threat. I don't want Russian oil and gas...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

American does generic American thing: "this is just like the foreign bad guys in my TV show!"

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago