this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
84 points (98.8% liked)

World News

39386 readers
2135 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Assad was a difficult time too. The difference is stability. Syria has been fucked since 2011. At least now they can rebuild without an obvious dictator - the future will be finding someone who isn't a dictator to take up power.

Israel, Turkey, Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc all want to control Syria so some coalition of foreign tyrants will rule for a bit, but this is ultimately a better future than under Assad.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

At least now they can rebuild without an obvious dictator

Ha. Good luck with that. Seems to be going great in libya, etc.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Miraculous time for all those innocents tortured in Assad's prisons and liberated since this toppeling. "A blessing from God (Allah)" they will say.

i am very optimistic for once for Syria

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Tahrir el sham has it's own fair share of torture

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

i am very optimistic for once for Syria

You should check out every other imperial invasion on the planet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Lots of misplaced optimism in this thread.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Natanyaho statement make me very pessimistic about Syria future

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This collapse is the direct result of our forceful action against Hezbollah and Iran

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Oh. I mean I don't know how direct it is but unfortunately (???) Israel contributed to a good thing for once. If this results in a free Syria I don't know he probably won't be able to sleep at night, but either way I think he's trying to take credit for it rather than Assad falling being some kind of 5D chess move. If it was anything like that Islamists wouldn't have been leading the offensive and HTS (which is Islamist) wouldn't be set to have the most influence in the post-Assad government.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

Nothing good about Islamic group talking control of the country. I am all for Bashar being out but it doesn't mean that the new rule will be better and that resistance groups in Palestine was getting arms from Syria.

This will only be good for America and Israel. They got a group that will fight Iran allies, keep Syria is rubble and allow more freedom for Israel to continue the genocide.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

No offense but the naivety here is pretty astounding. Just look at any other imperial invasions anywhere. I recommend libya or iraq for most relevance.

If it was anything like that Islamists wouldn’t have been leading the offensive and HTS (which is Islamist) wouldn’t be set to have the most influence in the post-Assad government.

Zionists and islamists have exactly the same goals with different religious branding. It's why ISIS apologized to the zios. Fascists work together as it suits them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Huh? That's so wrong I have no idea where you got it from. ISIS do not represent Islamists in general, or anyone but themselves. I'm not using "bad apples" logic here; ISIS was bad enough to be rejected by other Islamists, and almost everyone else. Israel, and the West in general, absolutely despise Islamists because they among other things are fundamentally opposed to Western hegemony and Israeli Apartheid, as would be observed from US behavior during the war on terror and its consideration of every Islamist organization out there are terrorist.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Can anyone EILI5 what the implications of this might be, and why?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 weeks ago

Look at any other imperial invasion on the planet. Libya, iraq, afghanistan, etc.

The implications are that the place will be totally destroyed and everything of value will be stolen.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nobody knows, probably all of them will start a war with each other and isis somehow will return.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I am not optimistic that this will turn out well in any way for anyone.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That's the whole point of imperialism.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There are multiple groups whose goals are in conflict, at best they will form a working non religious government.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe. Until they fight it out and one of them comes out on top.