this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Next Fucking Level

3086 readers
2 users here now

Next Fucking Level Videos and Gifs.

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Margaret Hamilton, NASA's lead developer for Apollo program, stands next to all the code she wrote by hand that took humanity to the moon in 1969

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And clickbait arrives on lemmy

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Man, I thought when we left Reddit shit was going to change?

First off, SHE didn't write all the code, she led a team (And probably wrote a decent chunk herself). It wasn't by hand it was on computers, no one writes computer code by hand, that's just blatantly a myth, even punch cards were normally done BY the computer, not "by hand".

Also something I've questioned before is if that's really "The source code" and not maybe 11 copies (There's 11 binders there) Though most reports from reputable sources say that's "Listings". AKA that's the logging, not the code itself. The code itself may be printed out but would be kept on Punch cards (Again printed by the computer, not by hand). And the final form was actually a rope. (no really)

The thing is the story of Margaret Hamilton (And in fact most programmers of the time) is incredible enough. But when you blatantly lie like this it actually diminishes her accomplishment because it's obviously false and people will tear it down or disbelieve it because it's blatant misinformation.

This is why I left Next Fucking Level, because it became misinformation and karma whoring. It became about the "Story" rather than the actual person/skill/talent/figure. But on Reddit the reason was because people wanted Karma. Shouldn't we have left the basement tier BS and lying behind as well?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know how old you are but when I was first introduced to programming in the early 80s all "source code" (Mostly basic and thus interpreted where program is the source code) was referred to as "listings" (this was when the main source of games were monthly magazines where you typed in a listing from a magazine and saved it to tape E.G.. The "Program listings" (as the Smithsonian calls them) seem to be print outs of the programs for verification purposes.

The process of entering was indeed handwritten, on specially printed sheets of paper that was then handed to a punchcard operator to create the cards (again according to the Smithsonian), But the stack of paper is clearly not those sheets as it is form-feed printer paper.

It is completely accurate that Margaret Hamilton lead a team, so while there are inaccuracies I'd say this not as much of a lie as just a combination of confused concepts,

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So I'm referring a number of articles that talk about it as "Listings" and "Log files". They come from relatively good sources (Smithsonian magazine) who are interviewing curators of of the Smithsonian who claim to have "Those listings" in the picture. They do however refer to it as "program listings" and then just "Listings" in the article. So who knows.

That being said I don't agree with your saying "Well she led a team"... yeah she led a team, that's like Elon Musk saying "I made a Tesla" when really he hired hundreds/thousands of people who made the Tesla. This is someone making an our right lie, there is no reason for it not to say "She and her team" or something along those lines.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So I’m referring a number of articles that talk about it as “Listings”

So am I. I read that article as well and "Program listings" is IMHO definitive, a "program listing" is a list of the instructions in the program it is a term I used to use myself, it's just fallen out of fashion. In addition this article shows form feed paper with a snippet of the actual code, one line per instruction.

Also, it's nothing like Musk, maybe you don't work in the industry but a "Team lead" is a programmer, just with additional organisational responsibilities. If you read the rest of the article I linked there are those that consider her the first professional "Software Engineer", and mistaking a team lead for the only member of the team is a common mistake, especially when they were the first programmer hired for the Apollo mission, It's a mistake, I wouldn't classify it as a lie.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

None of you better call yourselves nerds, THIS is a nerd.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Absolute deity

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Imagine having to look for the missing semicolon in there.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's probably written in Fortran66 or similar. No semicolons, but so many line numbers...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's written in assembly. You can check out the source code on GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For people unfamiliar with assembly, it's one step up from raw 1s and 0s. Just vaguely human readable abbreviations for given sets of 1s and 0s. There are no built in loops or if statements, you have to build all that shit yourself from scratch every time you want to use one. And there's exactly one built in variable you can use called the register

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oh that's so hardcore

edit: looking at the git repo, it looks like it was a team of seven, and she was the lead. So it isn't all her code. Still super impressive :)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

The other big notable thing for assembly is that it isn't portable. Assembly is very different for every processor architecture, unlike something like C where you may have to make some adjustments between an x86 vs ARM proc, in assembly you're basically rewriting it from scratch

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Undisputed GOAT.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Margaret is a legend.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

TIL

She invented the term "software engineering"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it have worked better if she wrote it into the computer? 🤔

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The title is a bit misleading, this is a printout of the code that she indeed wrote into the computer first.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

She also had a team of engineers who I'm sure deserve at least some of the credit. This title is bunk.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These people should have millions of followers instead we follow kardashians. No wonder the world is going to end😥

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She did computer stuff..... She's smart enough to not fuck with anything that has followers.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Hate to tell you, but like most people who do computer stuff still use social media. I mean the linux kernel has it's own lemmy instance.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

She didn’t write all of that, she had a team of programmers working under her

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

She was the first software engineer who was hired for the project and did write a good chunk of the code. She was more than someone who simply delegates and leads. Hell, she is the one who coined the term software engineer. She played a hell of a role in the history of software development. Let's not try to diminish that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Similar to what happened with the first image of a black hole. The whole thing was somehow attributed to one lady in the press. Turns out, it was a whole team of scientists working together to achieve that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

The problem isn't that the whole thing was attributed to one lady. The problem was how quickly people were to discredit her and minimize her role, something that was guaranteed to never be a problem if she were a man.

Funny how the credibility of male scientists and engineers are never questioned in posts like these, and yet becomes a hot topic when that person happens to be a woman.