this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
1494 points (99.6% liked)

Science Memes

11671 readers
1211 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago (9 children)

science makes me have faith in science.

Science is unironically one of the only things i ever trust because truth prevails, always...

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Science research on the one hand is cursed to follow the money.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

maybe this wording works on a certain kind of voter because of the "fuck you I got mine" attitude, they probably think that if they were the scientist they would reap the benefits for themselves

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

benefits of what, grant money you can't get anymore because there's no more federal funding? Oops.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

they wouldn't know about grants or how underpaid academics are in general, it's just a projection

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

thats part of the joke, unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately, real scientists have become lumped in with “industry shills paid to science the way industry wants them to science”.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

At first I read "have you ever met a single scientist?" As in "don't you know they're all fuckin?"

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We're all fucking all right. We are all fucking with the laws of nature. You like it when we stop your atoms moving and shine a laser at you, don't you, you dirty filthy condensate?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is so true, and I can’t even type that without a severe eyeroll of agreement.

I think that’s why some people wax poetic on Reddit or Lemmy with very little provocation. Finally…a captive audience that might read this info, even if they’re just passing time on the shitter…

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah. No one cares if you're rambling in a comment. Just be interesting enough that someone can pause their doom scrolling to read it.

I personally have about 5 subjects where I can chime in with fun (to me) little facts.

Or essays on the subject...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Quick , tell me a fun fact

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

currently questioning my sanity over whether key compound of my thesis did just did a ice-nine or not (it's a real thing, but not for water)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I've read about this before. That super sucks for you, but is a fascinating phenomenon. Good luck trying to chase that rabbit down.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

(is there an offtop thread?)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Wtf, I've never heard of this bug in my entire life, and just last week I took a picture of one. Google Lens comes up with Brown Marmorated Stink Bug, and I didn't think it would ever run into this tidbit of info ever again.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Gotta love when the conspiracy is so stupid that it’s the people who dedicated their lives to building and spreading human knowledge are the ones keeping the knowledge away from Joe public.

You know how Trump has been called the poor person’s idea of a rich person? I’m trying to think of the caricature they use for “scientist” in their minds. Maybe a woke Joe Rogan?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure it's just a vague conglomeration of Hollywood "scientists."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Not a scientist. I have a litany of complex topics that I just can't really talk to anyone about. I'm a big computer networking nerd, and once upon a time, when I didn't know what I didn't know, I was curious what computer networking really entailed... It seemed dead simple, you connect things to a switch, connect that switch to the internet router, not much more.

Then I learned about VLANs, which are cool but it seemed like unnecessary complexity. Then I learned about Routing and L3 switching, and routing protocols and..... Holy shit, how deep is this?

Now-a-days, I want to have conversations about the merits of one routing protocol over another in various contexts, and see/build a spine and leaf network infrastructure that's nearly infinitely scalable.

I want to explore the nuance of IP unnumbered routing. I can't find anyone who will chat about it on a level that's close to my understanding, either someone knows way more than I do, or they know way less.

IP unnumbered routing is a way of connecting devices without setting an IP on the interface that is being routed to/from. The other end uses the routing protocol on top of layer 2, and while the two might have a router ID, often in the form of an IP address, the interface that is connecting the two has no IP. It's basically advanced point to point protocol (PPP) that breaks away from traditional TCP/IP routing in ways that people who have never used anything besides TCP/IP can't really comprehend. The two "IP addresses" (actually router IDs) in play can have nothing in common. Traditional TCP/IP requires that two IPs share a subnet. In routing, this is typically a /30 for IPv4, and the two IPs are adjacent to eachother, eg, 10.254.123.1 and 10.254.123.2 IP unnumbered can have 10.254.123.2 talking directly with 172.30.88.207, with no layer 3 interfaces in-between.

It's really fascinating and interesting and I've been trying to find a good model or guide to help me learn this better, but I keep ending up at dead ends, and I have nobody to talk to about it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Now-a-days, I want to have conversations about the merits of one routing protocol over another in various contexts, and see/build a spine and leaf network infrastructure that’s nearly infinitely scalable.

bro i just want screensharing that isn't using the hell that is webrtc.

How hard is it to send video packets over IP, it can't be that difficult. Half the job is already done, and i can't imagine building a reliable networking protocol, even if you had to do it from scratch would be particularly hard.

everything is webrtc, it always has been.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Did my fair share of networking back in the day, but never heard of IP unnumbered. I was curious about the same idea back in the day and it is possible, but I haven't much seen anyone doing it for realsies. If you have any good longreads/vids on the topic, it'd be much appreciated.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I'll look at my resources and see what I can dig up. No promises, but the concepts are simple as long as you can separate yourself from the TCP/IP restrictions on two things needing to be in a subnet, and the idea that NAT is something that needs to happen.

Honestly, I've seen so many people get hung up on the fact that NAT isn't universal, or necessary.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Should shoot me a DM, have been studying for my CCNP and do want more networking buddies to potentially socialize with.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I've been looking at the CCNP for a while, I don't need it for the work I do at my day job, so I haven't prioritized taking the test or anything.

I should do more work on it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I need some help with networking and eventually getting an organisation website online; if you want to geek out a bit, please send me a dm. :)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

yeah uh... you lost me at 'protocols'

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I can only hope the changing mating habit is that they’ve all stopped mating. I hate those damn bugs.

They’re invasive where I live, and it seems like they don’t really have predators. And they’re so damn loud when they fly around inside your house. And they smell awful if you startle them or squish them. Only thing I can do is catch them in a cup and flush them down the toilet.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Shout out to the scientists who study the reproductive pattern of certain insects for the sole purpose of wiping them out.

We see you scientists that are sterilizing trillions of bugs then releasing them into the wild. Your work is wild, weird, but very effective.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago (2 children)

My friends are political science guys. They're just all getting blind drunk and muttering right now?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is why the "secret scientists don't want you to know" always turns out to be some pseudoscience bs that at best is misinformation and at worst is actively harming people. So, yes, they are things scientists don't want you to know.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

I would argue that we still want them to know about pseudoscience, but also know enough about everything else to understand how the pseudoscience is wrong.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›