Showerthoughts
A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.
Rules
- All posts must be showerthoughts
- The entire showerthought must be in the title
- Avoid politics
- 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
- 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
- 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
- Posts must be original/unique
- Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct
Does this mean the concept of infinity requires an infinite number of infinities?
Informally, yes. Formally, no. There is no cardinal sufficient such that every cardinal can fit in a set with that cardinality. Isn't that fascinating? There's too many infinities for us to mathematically express how many infinities there are.
I believe so. I wonder what is the ordinal of the set of ordinals.
A circle has an infinite number of corners.
Or zero...
therefore ∞ = 0 😀👍
Probably More accurate to say it has an infinite number of edges
A circle has one edge/side, that is grade-school geometry. There is no reason to engender confusion by trying to make it into a polygon or introducing infinity. Your model of shapes does not seem to account for curved edges.
Consider a stereotypical pizza slice. One might plainly say that it is a "like a triangle but one edge is curved" without falling into a philosophical abyss. :)
It's quite useful, though, to understand a curve or arc as having infinite edges in order to calculate its area. The area of a triangle is easy to calculate. Splitting the arc into two triangles by adding a point in the middle of the arc makes it easy to calculate the area... And so on, splitting the arc into an infinite number of triangles with an infinite number of points along the arc makes the area calculable to an arbitrary precision.
Or you could just enjoy your π
Imaginary numbers have a specific value, just like all the normal numbers we use on a daily basis. Infinity is not a specific value. Instead, it’s a qualitative property like “flat”, “periodic”, or “symmetric”.
I think of it this way, infinity is an action. It’s not a “thing.” This is why it’s not countable. It doesn’t stop to be counted.
What do you mean by action? Like, how running or writing are actions people can take? So maybe infinity would be an action a group of numbers can take?
The imaginary numbers and real numbers cross at infinity (on the Riemann sphere).
I find this all to be very irrational. I need to have some pi and think about it.
Come on, be rational...
Let’s be real, it’s a complex topic.
Infinity is a placeholder for uncountable large numbers and is used for stuff like either functions to describe the the craps behavior towards the "end" wich there is none.
A set is infinite exactly when there exists a proper subset whose cardinality is that of the set.
Why? What does it mean for something to be real?
I believe pure mathematics isn't concerned with its correspondence with reality.
I recall hearing a quote from the guy that coined the term "imaginary number", and how he regretted that term because it conveys a conceptualization of fiction. IIRC, he would rather that they would have been called "orthogonal numbers" (in a different plane) and said that they were far more real that people tend to hold in their mind. I think he said "they are as real as negative numbers" along the same lines of one not being able to hold a negative quantity of apples, for example.
The stray shower thought (beyond simply juxtaposing the discordant terms of 'imaginary' and 'real') was that infinity by contrast is a much weaker and fantastic concept. It destroys meaningful operations it comes into contact with, and requires invisible and growing workarounds to maintain (e.g. "countably" infinite vs "uncountably" infinite) which smells of fantasy, philosophically speaking.
So Descartes coined the term specifically as a dig because he didn't see any geometric possibilty to the concept. The concept seems to have roots going back to ancient Egypt, but the modern inquiry goes to the Renaissance. I think Gauss wanted to call them laterals.
It destroys meaningful operations it comes into contact with, and requires invisible and growing workarounds to maintain (e.g. “countably” infinite vs “uncountably” infinite) which smells of fantasy, philosophically speaking.
This isn't always true. The convergent series comes to mind, where an infinite summation can be resolved to a finite number.
Furthermore, it is meant to highlight the fact that people gleefully embrace the concept of infinity, but try their hardest to avoid and depreciate the concept of imaginary numbers. It would appear to me that the bias ought to be reversed.
I mean, complex numbers are important for quantum mechanics. In that sense, they are closer to reality as they are used to describe the underlying blocks of reality to our current best understanding
You don't even have to go into quantum mechanics. I vaguely recall using a real/imaginary plane with a rotating vector to do something about electricity in first year engineering?
Don't worry I'm not actually an electrical engineer.
But my point is that there are applications for imaginary numbers with very practical engineering applications. Foundational, even.
something about electricity
It's a usefull technique to model the symmetry between magnetic and electrical power.
Amazing. Your shower thought is incorrect on both counts. Perhaps you meant to say "conceivable?"
I'm guessing they maybe mean that they have a more trivial practical resolution to real numbers, in that i^2=-1?
Kinda like "yeah they're imaginary but I understand that if I hit them with a certain stick they become real"