this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
475 points (93.9% liked)

196

16488 readers
1629 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

Misandry is not going to help anyone but misogynists

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Gotta put maga chuds on there too. There's a literal movement (4B) to not f--- those people.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

Don't make it so obvious....

It's hard enough to find someone already. Like - ok fine I get it, yes, being a lesbian (or bi) feels like the only way anyway, cuz like yeah, how can you not like girls. I find that somewhat hard to imagine.

but that turns into a bad thing, because all of a sudden you have all these super pretty girls in the dating space and they are all prettier, smarter and more comfy cozy than you!!! I feel this is especially the case when transfem (but what do i know)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago

Tate? Why put the monitor in vertical its a factor?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 19 hours ago

Everyone just scrollin' past this post.

Grats!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 271 points 1 day ago (6 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 18 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 19 hours ago

this hits the funny

[–] [email protected] 28 points 21 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 60 points 23 hours ago

beautiful thank you

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That s not true , of course doing the basic minimum of a normal human IS required but its not enough to have a gf today. The loneliness epidemic is real and not all lonely guy are complete moron. Personally I think one major factor is the privatization of love.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 17 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Wow this has a lot of up votes. Of course the loneliness epidemic is real but why blame something nebulous like the privatization of love when capitalism is right there. There's a profit motive in getting people to work longer hours for less pay and have less free time to build community

[–] [email protected] 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yes I just wanted to be more precise , in fact I was talking about the fact that more than halft of the meeting are donne thanks to dating app and that the algorithms of those app are made to make you dependent of those app and not for there original purpose . I think I m not clear but basically enshitifaction of dating app are a real problem and one major cause of loneliness that s what I wanted to say. Sorry for my broken english its not my first language

[–] [email protected] 6 points 18 hours ago

Oh yeah dating apps are a problem of capitalism too -- I know some people who've met their life partners on old apps but that's despite their tendency to keep you addicted to the app rather than finding someone

[–] [email protected] 43 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Don't forget the commodification of all the 3rd places so now there's no real place for people to interact without having to spend money

[–] [email protected] 12 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Very thankful my community has public libraries, churches, community bike shops, makerspaces, etc because I know they're declining in some places, churches especially (too bad they're religious and they can't just switch to community organizations) also civic clubs like Rotary and lions club.

Can't take those orgs for granted they decay without involvement

[–] [email protected] 40 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Ask someone out for coffee. Talk about your week. Ask about theirs. Don't treat the interaction as a pass/fail. Repeat. If you have mutual attraction then nature will play out.

Doing the bare minimum hygiene and the appearance of happiness drastically improves your chances.

Dating is for finding someone you enjoy being around. Sex is a result of growing closer.

Obviously some people have it easier than others but I have peers that just refuse to ask people out for coffee or a lunch. I'm a late millennial if that matters.

Be a decent person and if a love interest doesn't personally find you attractive they WILL tell their friends. NEVER talk poorly about your previous relationships. Learn a few jokes.

The privatization of love is a real problem but the classic approach isn't dead.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

My issue is with your first sentence (cis white man that is about as just barely straight). With all of the talk about equality, equity, and BS gender roles, I'm still expected to make all of the initial moves and decisions in real life and on apps. However, I'm mildly on the spectrum and my natural tenancy is to be very aggressive in my methods (not in a violent way and not just with people, just mean I am very earnest, locked in, and tenacious with most things I do).

I have never been approached, hit on, or asked out by a women in real life, though I have by men a couple of times. When I'm in public or at a bar I am literally invisible, unless I happen to walk into a women's zone of awareness (not personal space, but the point/distance where they then have to make a judgment as to whether I am a threat or not).

The advantage of online dating is that if I match with someone it's reasonable to assume they are interested in me which puts me past the initial barrier in real life of not being able to tell. At that point I'm pretty OK at interacting with a person and flirting etc. However, my hobbies and the things I would like a partner to enjoy doing with me are very male dominated.

The result of this is that I haven't ever had a partner or dated someone who didn't have crippling anxiety and/or deep self-image issues where they use their partner for all of the validation and structure they haven't figured out how to do from within themselves. Which at least to me makes sense, since women with the same interests as mine are surrounded by men all the time everyday, and so the confident well adjusted women have the metaphorical pick of the litter and probably end up with one of the few not problematic men in that space that are also well adjusted.

I am well aware it's far more complicated than that, and that women face a number of other struggles, but Game Theory does still very much apply, and so as I was saying before despite all of the rhetoric about equity, I still have to play by the old rules while somehow also playing by the new ones at the same time.

It's exhausting.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 17 hours ago (13 children)

Ask someone out for coffee

Who?

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

appearance of happiness

I see now. That is holding me back by a lot.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Rule 1. Be happy.

Rule 2. Don't be unhappy.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The whole fake it till you make it thing can be applicable here but therapy is valid and cheaper than you think. You are worthy and deserving of love.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 19 hours ago

I strongly recommend being happy, one of the best feelings really. I've tried the other emotions and they just don't feel the same. (But seriously I'm no fun when I'm depressed. People like being around happy people, it's contagious)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Do a group activity which has members of the demography you’re trying to attract. Show that you’re useful in a social environment and you will gain status and thus attract mates.

That can be anything from environmental protection, sports, politics, arts, music, games, organizing parties.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You forgot the two most important steps:

  1. Be attractive
  2. Don't be unattractive

Otherwise it will not work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

If you mean physical and optical attraction, that can be improved by hygiene, clothing, haircut, exercise, makeup, diet.

Other factors like manners, conversational skills, generosity, outlook, morals, ethics, dance skills, art skills etc. can also be worked on.

Below average looking guys will easily pull women, if they have status and a purpose/passion in life. Status isn’t just money, it can be just being known for being useful in your social circles.

Ugly people have sex and spouses as well.

Yes, the bottom 10% of men have it harder. However most of them can work on themselves to improve their attractiveness immensely.

One advantage men have, is their attractiveness increases with age. For women it goes downhill in their 30s. For men that’s when their peak starts.

I’m now 42 and more women in their late 20s are interested in me than ever before in my life. Single late 30s women are often desperate to find a husband. The older men get, the bigger their dating range becomes. As a rule of thumb men can get women at their age or younger. Women will go for men their age or older. Woman with wrinkles and grey streaks: old hag grandma. Man with wrinkles and grey streaks: handsome and trustworthy.

So if you want to attract the most desirable women, work on yourself until you’re 30 and then start looking for a wife.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Of all that, only hygiene and exercise improve attraction, and it requires going to the gym 6 times a week and using performance enhancing drugs for it to make a difference.

Diet, clothing and haircut are mostly irrelevant. The only things that matter are height (1m80 is the minimum acceptable nowadays), muscles, and having a nice face. All three are required.

Source: I'm very small (1m70) and ugly, and having the ability to bench press my own weight doesn't help at all.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Your ideas of attractiveness are very skewed. If you only do only dating face and body matter more, because it’s much of what you see. However fashion and displayed activities, and status also play a role. But you might be better off looking for mates elsewhere.

Lots of short men with non athletic bodies and mediocre looks get laid every day.

Body and face beauty certainly helps, but there are diminishing returns. Except of course if you want to date super models.

Not being fat and doing some exercise or sports twice a week already puts you way ahead of the pack.

If you go and play social mixed gender volleyball instead of autistically lifting every day, you will have more opportunities and success.

What do you have to offers partner? Are you fun to hang out with? Do you do fun or interesting activities? Do you perform or make art?

For example: even the most low level DJs or musicians will have more success, than a grumpy loner who asks people if they know all albums of the band shirt they’re wearing.

So you’re short, athletic, and have an ugly face. What about your skills, interests, fashion, and activities?

Plenty of women are much shorter than you. If you live in the Netherlands or Mexico makes a difference.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

T'es pas petit je fait 1m63 1m70 c'est pas mal a coté x)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Allegedly he's some Mexican bootleg version of Tate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Temach my balls!

No?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›