It may not be this particular case, but I remember looking into something similar before where an oil and gas company claimed a similar reduction in emissions at one of their plants, but the fine print made clear that the number came from a device installed on only one of several exhaust towers that was only able to operate for short periods of time, and was removed shortly after getting the publicity because it was considered too expensive to maintain.
this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
81 points (100.0% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5240 readers
574 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Don't worry about the lack of a 95% reduction, the incoming federal admin will do its utmost to deregulate anyway. Real GOOD people, the best 👍👍👍
I, for one, super trust the self reporting of the oil and gas industry.