Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
Comments.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
While our previewer was optimistic about the potential of the story cutscenes and character builds he got a taste of, he ultimately left that session less impressed than he hoped he would be. Maybe the full game will fare better!
Even without the review copy they find stuff to make fun of.
Isn't this always online? Because they just added denuvo as well which seems pretty dumb if it's already always online.
Apparently they're adding an offline story mode after release, so I guess they're hoping the Denuvo won't be cracked before then? The best DRM they have is the fact that the game won't be worth pirating.
WB Games didn't send out any review copies because they know the game is ass and early reviews would only hurt sales.
I can't remember the last time a review embargo was placed on a game, or when major outlets didn't get review code - and the game turned out to be okay.
It's a tale as old as time, and particularly egregious this time round with the late-notice addition of Denuvo.
I mean, die hard fans won't mind either way and good on them, I hope they enjoy it - but for others who pre-ordered the game, I suppose you're only getting what you deserve.
Basically all games have review embargoes. If you're lucky it's before release and you get the code even earlier, but there's almost always a date you can't publish before.
The issue you're looking for is not sending code out before release so that there are no reviews at launch, so they get more people buying it blind instead of consulting a bunch of negative reviews and deciding not to.
Hi-Fi Rush last year. No review copies, since the game was announced and released on the same day. Turned out to be a really fun rhythm action game.
That's hardly an embargo, that's just an extreme version of "not having a crazy hype-campaign"
I'd say it still counts, since the question was about review embargoes OR no pre-release copies provided to reviewers. Hype or no hype, you'd still be asking gamers to buy it based on nothing but previews, trailers and/or developer rep.
Doom 2016 comes to mind. No early review copies but it turned out to be a good game. It's very much an outlier, though.
yeah i remember zenimax not sending review copies but dont remember if they did it with any other higher profile games
Oh cool, that's an interesting factoid.
I suppose at least we had the open beta programme with Doom though - granted it's not review code by it's very definition, but it was something tangible to see that it was going to be not shit at the very least.
factoid
"factoid" doesn't mean "fun little fact", it means "Something unreliable that gets repeated so much, people think it's true".
Well there we go, every day's a school day!
Yeah, that's a huge part of why I don't pre-order games anymore. If I wait a few days, I can get a pretty good feel for if the game is worth my time (relatively bug-free, fun, etc). Best case scenario, I avoid a dud and save myself time and money. Worst case scenario, I play a good game a few days after everyone else.
So, don't pre-order a game until reviews you trust are out. Being a few days late won't wreck your enjoyment of a good game.
The only review you can definitively trust is your own. No commentary playthroughs are abundant on YouTube. If you can’t scan through and find a fun mechanic in the first 20 minutes, the game isn’t worth playing, in my opinion.
Yikes. That's how you know it's bad. 😬