this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
282 points (85.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

9639 readers
262 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

what if carbomb?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

So basically, a submission that places fuck cars users at the level of this guy. Makes sense, fits all my expectations for them.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 weeks ago

The responses to this on the other post were the same, punitive and wrathful with no space left for critical thinking.

How many people shop online then consume media showing the impacts of climate change or reports of warehouse working conditions within the delivery window? How many "fuck cars" users also subscribe to gentle parenting content? How many were raised in Christian homes and currently hold negative views on religion generally?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

People can hate cars AND help humans in need, even car users.

Flooding wouldn't be so bad without global car dependency.

I'm sorry for all the losses the people have to endure, but after this is over, there needs to be a discussion how to prevent disaster like these or minimise their impact on human and general environment.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Flooding wouldn’t be so bad without global car dependency.

because of climate change or...?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

The financial, spatial and carbon economy of motorised private transport is inefficient, including its infrastructure. Opportunity costs of missing climate action due to economical reliance on private transport, spatial constraints of land use for traffic and inefficient housing (private transport induced sprawl) are just two examples for that.

Climate change fuels flooding frequency and severity, so fueling climate change with fossil fuelled private transport is irresponsible.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Reduced inpacts of climate change but more importantly better urban design. Long, straight, impermeable roads guide water wherever it wants to go with little resistance or slow downs. Cities can be built to be more permeable to handle water better, they can also implement stomwater retention and detention ponds.

Many cities currently waste lots of space on asphalt for cars. We could build transit with permeable surfaces (such as grassy tram lines or cycle lanes designed from permeable materials). We could build less parking lots and save that space for stormwater ponds.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What happened to basic human decency .

They are mourning 200 dead in a disaster zone.

Can’t you shut your fucking mouth for one week ?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I'll shut up when we mourn the death and maiming caused by the use of cars.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Devastation shocks the brain full of thoughts and feelings, navigating around the rocks takes courage

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

I've seen a lot of terrible things.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Well, that’s vile and also a clinically psychopathic lack of empathy.

I hope that when you grow up, you manage to reconnect with your humanity.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I hope that when you grow up, you manage to reconnect with your humanity.

The same to you then.

You remind me of the people who complain about talk of gun regulations after mass shootings.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

The thing is, you're both right. It's a vile and cynical lack of empathy on both your parts. He's exactly right, far more people die daily who get none of your empathy. If people dying on the road is supposed to change our behaviour, then what about you?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

They're not both right. Vile rhetoric sews division. Calling it out and appealing to humanity are acts of strength that bind us together.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

I do wonder how you know what i do with my empathy.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Jesus fucking Christ. I get advocating for less car reliance but cheering the deaths of people just for owning cars is beyond fucked.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Who are cheering the death? The post had no mention of dead people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The comment was removed but it was there and it had a depressing number of up votes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This one?

Wow, 2 opvotes vs 52 downvotes. Soo depressing.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

The post was new at the time and there were no downvotes.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Its black humor, not cheering the deaths of people. It's pointing out that we've been warning the world for years that exactly this will happen, and now it has in a way that resembles a system correcting itself. There's no joy in hilighting this, just ironic tragedy and the laughter of the gallows.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

"I will shed no tears for any car owner killed in this disaster. They got what they deserved. For everyone else, I wish I knew where to donate toward any relief funds.” -- [email protected]

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The comment is likely gone now but there was someone cheering in the comments.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

And had they replied to that comment they would have had a point.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So brave to seize on a natural disaster and massive human tragedy. How proud of yourselves you must be.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

“Natural” disaster.

This is like when republicans whine about how inappropriate it is to criticize loose gun regulations after a mass shooting.

No. This is exactly the time to bring it up.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I guess fuck all the buildings and lives as well, right?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

The destruction of automobiles during a disaster which was made far worse as a result of climate change is a very poignant juxtaposition.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Also fuck greedy investor urbanism. Valencia spent an enormous amount of time and money to redirect a river prone to flooding outside of the city. And then promptly urbanized the risky flood plain with housing and commerce.