this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
55 points (82.4% liked)

Showerthoughts

29698 readers
861 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    1. NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    2. Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    3. Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct-----

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It's also implied that she engages in statutory rape.

She's unaware of Josh's real age though, so I don't know the legal or moral implications.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

At least he appears to be a grown ass man, unlike the Disney film Blank Check.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

The worst double standard we have as a society is that only girls are victims of weird stuff like this.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

What the hell am I watching

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

She was a fed too wasn't she?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Jfc. Gross.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

immediately what I thought of when I read this post. Even when I was 10 I was like "this is weird..."

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Moral implications don't exist for her. She saw a fully adult male.

Legal implications don't exist, because no law on the books takes into account the concept of a child inhabiting an adults body.

Josh on the other hand......

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 weeks ago

Josh is a child and bears no responsibility for any sexual encounters

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Solid assessment.

I think the closest legal grounds we have would be when an adult that has the mental capacity of a child is the victim. Of course this isn't the same scenario, and all tangible evidence is lost when Josh returned to his normal body.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Any questionable acts would happen after the movie's end. My thoughts have always been what the effects were to Susan once she saw he was telling the truth. We don't even really get that short of the look of amazement, and maybe shock on her face.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

I'd imagine she would be the one feeling violated here.