having a drone wait while a human makes a decision can cede the initiative to the enemy
This isn't a good way to make the point they seem to think they're making.
Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.
Rules (Subject to Change)
--Be a Decent Human Being
--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title
--Posts must have something to do with the topic
--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.
--No NSFW content
--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world
having a drone wait while a human makes a decision can cede the initiative to the enemy
This isn't a good way to make the point they seem to think they're making.
Experts? You mean, "People who saw Terminator"?
While those are great points, what do we do when Canada invades with kill bots that fire as fast and accurately as an online FPS cheat bot and we can't even get a shot off?
I don't think these researchers realize why the military wants a switch to have a weapon go AI. The military absolutely wants people in the loop, but they also want the capability to turn it all over to the onboard computer if need be.
Fuck Ted Faro!
Experts warn eventual war will be disastrous.
Honestly, I'm all for it. Designate some land where they can fight, and have wars be fought with robots, on robots. Whomever's team wins, wins the war.
If full scale war ever breaks out and everything is on the line, the Geneva convention and altruism and worrying about only shooting enemy combatants will mostly fly out of the window. You think Little Boy and Fat Man were being selective about which people they were turning into radioactive dust?
Those things exist to whitewash war so our imperialism doest look too gross to those in the homeland.
No no no, they have it all wrong. We should be ordering clones by the thousand from Kamino to fight the separarists.
It's a nice thought but they referenced land mines. The idea that an AI shooting a soldier could cause a conflict spiral could happen with a land mine. Not to mention humans make mistakes too. A human soldier could the same (and has). Automated sentry guns have already been around for over 10 years.
One of the closest times we came to nuclear annihilation is when a Soviet nuclear detection system malfunctioned and said the US launched a nuke. The human operator determined the system was most likely at fault and they decided not to do anything.
Neither are infallible but if a computer gets bad data it doesn't know it's bad data.
Well at least they're not using chatGPT on their homework. \s
I dunno, with how willing humans are to commit atrocities on purpose I'm not sure the unintentional autonomous killing is going to be sugnificantly worse.
We still shouldn't do it, but they are really playing up the level headed decision making that doesn't seem to be that common in reality.
LOL we sure are working hard to manifest the worst outcomes of the most far-fetched 80s sci-fi apocalypse movies
honestly at this point i'm leaning team skynet
T2 started in 2029
Maybe that was the real story of Skynet .... it was built by a group that were trying to defeat the runaway military industrial complex. The machines weren't trying to destroy all humans, they just wanted us to stop fighting. And we didn't want to stop fighting.
Im really starting to see SkyNets argument as I get older.
Thanos too
They just need to centralize the brain in some bullet proof bunker and give it sentience. WCGW?
So many fun possible futures right now. Which one will be our fate?