Article seems to be full of typos that make the meaning unclear
SpaceX
A community for discussing SpaceX.
Related space communities:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
Memes:
Perhaps Ryan had an off day? Are the typos still there? I didn't notice any on my most recent read...
Headline says, “Flight 6 already tested” which is misleading until you read in the article it means static test.
only two flights, Flight 1 and Flight 4, have had engine outs on ascent. In fact, during all phases of flight for Flight 4, not a single Raptor shut down prematurely.
Contradiction, I think they mean flight 5 had no engine outs
I stopped reading here
Headline says, “Flight 6 already tested” which is misleading until you read in the article it means static test.
Eh, I think the distinction between test and launch is pretty clear, especially given that the article thumbnail is a photo of said statice fire.
Contradiction, I think they mean flight 5 had no engine outs
Oh, good catch, I missed that detail.