this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
112 points (79.8% liked)

Linux

48069 readers
681 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We often get the same question with

"I'm new, what distro do you recommend?"

and I think we should make a list/ discussion on what is our pick for each person, and just link that post for them to give them an easy recommendation.

So I made a quick flow chart (will get polished as soon as I get your input) with my personal recommendations. It is on the bottom of the text, so you see the rest of the text here too.

I will also explain each distro in a few, short sentences and in what aspects they do differ and what makes them great.


Here are my "controversial" things I want to discuss with you first, as I don't want to spread nonsense:

Nobara

I don't know if we should recommend it as a good gaming distro. In my opinion, it's a highly insecure and experimental distro, made by one individual. I mean, sure, it gives you a slightly better experience ootb compared to vanilla Fedora, but:

  • As said, it's made by one single guy. If he decides to quit this project, many many people will just stop getting updates.
  • There are many security-things, especially SELinux, disabled.
  • It's severely outdated. Some security fixes take months until they arrive on Nobara.
  • It contains too many tweaks, especially kernel modifications and performance enhancers. Therefore, it might be less reliable.

I think, Bazzite is the way superior choice. It follows the same concept, but implements it in way better fashion:

  • Just as up-to-date as the normal Fedora, due to automatic GitHub build actions.
  • No burden of maintenence, either on the user or the dev side.
  • Fully intact security measures.
  • And much more.

Immutable distros

I'm a huge fan of them and think, that they are a perfect option for newcomers. They can't brick them, they update themselfes in the background, they take a lot of complexity compared to a traditional system, and much more. Especially uBlue and VanillaOS are already set up for you and "just work".
If you want to know more about image-based distros, I made a post about them btw :)

VanillaOS

It's the perfect counterpart for Mint imo. It follows the same principle (reliable, sane, easy to use, very noob friendly, etc.), but in a different way of achiving that.

The main problems are:

  • The team behind it isn't huge or well established yet, except for the development of Bottles.
  • They want to do many things their own way (own package manager, etc.) instead of just using established stuff.
  • The current release (V2, Orchid) is still in beta atm.

I see a huge potential in that particular distro, but don't know if I should recommend it at this point right now.

ZorinOS

I think, for people who don't like change, it's great, but it can be very outdated. What's your opinion on that distro? It looks very modern on the surface and is very noob friendly, but under the hood, very very old.

Pop!_OS

Same with that. Currently, there's only the LTS available, since System76 is currently very busy with their new DE. I don't know if we should recommend it anymore.


I made the list of recommendations relatively small on purpose, as it can be a bit overwhelming for noobs when they get a million recommendations with obscure distros.
Do you think that there are any distros missing or a bad recommendation?


top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Are you kidding me with the pink font on pink boxes? Or is that a sync glitch? Cant read most of the text

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

It's a glitch, and also outdated.
It was just a sketch, and the "real" post is out now :)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

I don’t have any specific beef with your chart but I do feel like we sometimes do a disservice to newbies by focusing on distros rather than the main desktop environments and what differentiates them. I wouldn't hesitate to recommend basically any of the Fedora spins or Debian-based distros to beginners.

The choice between KDE, Gnome, Cinnamon, etc. is much more consequential for a new user than DNF vs. Apt (especially in the Flatpak era).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

You need to limit the options.

Linux systems

  • Debian (stable, almost no bloatware, user unfriendly, apt)

  • ArchLinux (unstable, bleeding edge software, user unfriendly, pacman)

  • RHEL/ Fedora (semi-stable, newer software, relatively user friendly, dnf)

Then at max list 3 Systems that derive from each main OS.

Like

Debian: Ubuntu, Mint, PoP!OS ArchLinux: manjaro... Fedora: Nobara...

Where each should be user friendly to use. Also explain what stable means, like that unstable doesn't mean shit breaks on a regular basis but rather it can sometimes happen. Normal desktop users don't need the stability of Debian. But it is nice to have if you can live with outdated software (if it isn't already on flatpak).

[–] [email protected] 27 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Ah shit, I'm 13.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Slight problem with the meme vs what OP is doing: Someone evaluating choices isn't going to know what to search for from logos. They'll n only recognize Google, Apple, and Windows, with a slight possibility on Linux distros.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

If a user does not like CLI or is not comfortable fixing anything, then suggest OpenSUSE. Built in snapper rollback for problems and YAST2-GTK GUI apps to configure anything, no CLI skills needed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

You're missing the whole security community. Kali, QubesOS, TAILS

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

People who think its too complicated won't make it to the bottom of the flow chart.

tl;Dr needs to go at the top, not the bottom. That's the point. They won't make it to the bottom.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Came here to say this too

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

I use Zorin OS for my laptop that's gotta be at least 15+ years but still kicking it. Outlasted the newer laptop I bought that was only 5 years old.

As someone who is only mildly into tech, Zorin is certainly familiar and I would probably recommend it to people.

I downloaded Gallium OS for my mom on her Chromebook, that's perhaps another important consideration to make...what laptop someone has.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

sorry if this is harsh but this seems like kind of a waste of time when distrochooser.de exists? I think it'd make a ton of sense to link that in the sidebar but a wall of text (or a huge flow chart) is just gonna be skipped by the type of people who are asking what distro to use first instead of researching it themselves anyway. if someone's asking in a forum like Lemmy or even in discord servers, they usually just want quick answers. if we're gonna link them something instead of just saying "mint" or whatever, it should at least be something easily digestible like distrochooser.de

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

What do you think about something like this? It's more of a "build your own sandwich" approach.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My prefered OS is missing. Must be a bug. Plz add NixOS kthx

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Already done in the final version ;) But you won't be happy, I've put it into my "pain"-category :D

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Guix > Nix, because I'm more angry about not being able to run the former than the latter.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Kubuntu. Unless you come from osx(then gnome), or have a really old computer.

load more comments
view more: next ›