this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Ukraine

8185 readers
50 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants in any form is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Tape loses tackiness in moist or humid conditions so before summer the UA will want to switch to steel plumber's tape/pipe straps.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

mmm tetanus bomb

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (4 children)

On Ukraines side, but those nail bombs violate the Geneva Convention

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The poor invading forces have an easy way to avoid it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

It's more like most states interpret it to allow reciprocity.

Can't handle the heat, don't start a fire, etc.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Geneva Convention guidelines

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Geneva spam pamphlets

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I didn’t know that. What is the difference between this, and “built-in” shrapnel in explosives (from a legal perspective)? The end result is all the same after the explosion

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Only think I know is that fragment size can't be too small, maybe you can argue that a nail is untested and thus can make micro fragments? Curious to know why this wouldn't be allowed

Edit: looks like there is a general ban on "unnecessary suffering or superfluous wounds", so if the nails are strong enough to injure but not kill, they are prohibited.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Let’s do some thorough testing then. For uh.. science

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Increased lethality to the target is OK though

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, this topic is pretty crazy. I get banning nukes, and gassing, but shrapnal limitations?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Right so my understanding is something like fishhooks would be illegal because they’re shaped to maximize suffering, but these would be fine.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Some of those nails are rusty. It's not hygienic.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

TIL war is okay as long as you're hygienic.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Absolute redneck engineering

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'd imagine a thin 3d printed jacket filled with ball bearings will exponentially increase the amount of shrapnell, it this ghetto variant looks nasty too.