this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
82 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

954 readers
42 users here now

A tech news sub for communists

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have to respond to what @[email protected] wrote in Linux for Leftists since I'm banned from there for not bending the knee to liberals. Funny how I got proven right about the CoC, but anyway...

Well, it is actually kind of “understandable” if you look at this here.

While the legal requirements can be understandable, what can't be is that it took them 2+ years to act on it (sanctions were in place for a long time).

And what's not understandable is their bullshit requirements:

The documentation Greg is looking for (which a group of Lawyers at the LF will verify) is that someone in the removed list doesn't actually work for an OFAC SDN sanctioned entity.

Think about it. They're expecting people to prove they DON'T work for a company. How do you prove something like that? Send them a picture of an empty desk and point to the lack of employment contract? It's a bullshit requirement that nobody can meet, thus ensuring Russians stay banned.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have to respond to what @[email protected] wrote in Linux for Leftists since I’m banned from there for not bending the knee to liberals. Funny how I got proven right about the CoC, but anyway…

I dont quite understand, but I guess it has nothing to do with my content? Like, I dont remember you and I hope I had nothing done to get you banned from there.

While the legal requirements can be understandable, what can’t be is that it took them 2+ years to act on it (sanctions were in place for a long time).

I know what you mean. With understandable I only mean, that according to Linus there are following what their lawyers are saying. And they also seem to be very quite about it, like the cant speak about it (something like NDA or they have to be carefull). They are still vague and the transparency is bad. Are they pressured or how much is the US government involved in all of this.

Think about it. They’re expecting people to prove they DON’T work for a company. How do you prove something like that? Send them a picture of an empty desk and point to the lack of employment contract? It’s a bullshit requirement that nobody can meet, thus ensuring Russians stay banned.

I really really dont actually know. My guess is that they probably have to provide documents about their place of work. This are personal information and nobody would be happy about this.

My biggest problem is, that everything is vague and still not clear. Its fishy, but there is probably more behind of it and they are hiding it. Either on purpose or, what I think is more possible, because they are somehow not allowed or strongly advised to not say anything.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess it has nothing to do with my content?

Oh yeah! Nothing to do with you, I was just explaining why I am responding in this thread, rather than where you wrote your post.

With understandable I only mean, that according to Linus there are following what their lawyers are saying.

Oh I know, and I agreed with you. The legal requirements are understandable, there's many legal requirements for all sorts of things. I was just adding on that if it were about the legal requirements, then they would have done it once those requirements came into force.

My biggest problem is, that everything is vague and still not clear. Its fishy, but there is probably more behind of it and they are hiding it.

"When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time." - Maya Angelou

Torvalds came out and said he hates Russians, I think we should believe him.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Oh yeah! Nothing to do with you, I was just explaining why I am responding in this thread, rather than where you wrote your post.

Ah OK, sometimes my english understanding skills suffer :)

I was just adding on that if it were about the legal requirements, then they would have done it once those requirements came into force.

I understand now. It makes a lot of sense, didnt thought about that. The war is going for two years now, but they decided to do it right now. Should they have pressure from the US government, than it is a bad sign for the open source community. It shows clearly, that the decision making of important projects like the Linux Kernel, can get heavily influenced by them. Not good and choosing the USA as a location is a bad decision and should be avoided in the future.

Torvalds came out and said he hates Russians, I think we should believe him.

I totaly believe him. I guess you can troll him by sending a simple mail like "hello Linus how are you?" with a russian TLD and he will believe it is a top-tier professional russian actor. Tbh he formulated all this in a way like his Finnish ancestry is the reason for this. Some people should not talk or make decisions about things about they don't know anything.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

As to sending me a revert patch - please use whatever mush you call brains. I’m Finnish. Did you think I’d be supporting Russian aggression? Apparently it’s not just lack of real news, it’s lack of history knowledge too."

does this mean he is proud that they sided with nazi germany?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Possibly not openly proud, but I would guess that yes.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

...Fuck...Learning BSD jumped to high priority on my to do list. I get the feeling that as a tech savvy comrade, my life right now is going to be focusing on developing tech skills for the sole purpose of fighting against the Empire, along with helping PSL more. Anti-imperialist tech is a must, and any ties to the Empire cannot be trusted.

I'm probably going to attempt to run Free/OpenBSD and virtualize Linux like I do with Windows now. Maybe more work will be done on BSD and Gentoo BSD projects will be resurrected and supported.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

Linus comment on the subject is the corn in the shit:

"Ok, lots of Russian trolls out and about.

It's entirely clear why the change was done, it's not getting reverted, and using multiple random anonymous accounts to try to "grass root" it by Russian troll factories isn't going to change anything.

And FYI for the actual innocent bystanders who aren't troll farm accounts - the "various compliance requirements" are not just a US thing.

If you haven't heard of Russian sanctions yet, you should try to read the news some day. And by "news", I don't mean Russian state-sponsored spam.

As to sending me a revert patch - please use whatever mush you call brains. I'm Finnish. Did you think I'd be supporting Russian aggression? Apparently it's not just lack of real news, it's lack of history knowledge too."

Linus Torvalds Comments On The Russian Linux Maintainers Being Delisted

What was the big crime of this maintainers? Being from Russia.

Meanwhile, Torvalds and the Linux Foundation are madly boot-licking and cock-sucking the Mossad and the IDF.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Linus is a very intelligent person in the field he has talent. Outside of it, especially if it gets combine with his attitude, he as quite a clown.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What was the big crime of this maintainers?

Exactly, and even if he booted them from the maintainers list, why does he revert the code changes as well? ON WHAT BASIS!?

LINUS YOU FUCK

FUCK

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's entirely clear why the change was done

No, like please explain it!!!! WTF

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago

the "russian troll" statement makes it clear that this guy is deep in nafo stuff

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

the “various compliance requirements” are not just a US thing.

True, is a NATO thing.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

From the comments:

Linus reports to IBM/RedHat and their requirements are now Linux/Linus requirements. As a result today we can officially stop calling the Linux kernel "open".

~~And a large part of the open stack as well, including g-libraries, gnome, wayland and everything hosted on freedesktop.org.~~ *

EDIT: * No relation at all.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And a large part of the open stack as well, including g-libraries, gnome, wayland and everything hosted on freedesktop.org.

This is just phoronix commenters trying to extend the anger to their favorite hate targets.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

True, freedesktop.org has no direct affiliation with the Linux Foundation.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's obvious that Linux is now under RedHat control, who themselves are controlled by the US govt. BSD's popularity is about to go up. I hope these Russian kernel maintainers switch to BSD, god knows BSD needs the drivers.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I don't like the BSD license very much, I am more in hope that GNU Hurd finally kicks off, but I doubt any of the two happens.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don’t like the BSD license very much

Why? Linux kernel is GPL, doesn't protect it from stuff like this. At least you can be certain that Theo de Raadt isn't going to kick people who contribute to BSD off the project based on their location. Contributors to tech projects should be chosen on merit, not ethnicity or citizenship (or any other characteristic that is irrelevant to the project).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I know nothing about Theo de Raadt, what makes you say that he wouldn't? Never used a BSD, but not particular appealing that it's not GPL.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

what makes you say that he wouldn’t?

Because he seems like a no-bullshit kind of guy when it comes to the OS he started. I don't see him kicking Russians off the OpenBSD project just because that is the politically expedient. OpenBSD always chooses to do what is better for security than what is popular. This means they focus on the technical aspects, and don't care about the political ramifications of their decisions.

He also went to a ruBSD conference in 2014. http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20140115054839

This is his personal website: https://theos.com/deraadt/

OpenBSD doesn't have a Code of Conduct either, because the project is run by "old school" techies/computer nerds who don't need a document to tell them racism or homophobia is bad and that people who work on a project together shouldn't insult one another based on characteristics that have nothing to do with the person's ability to code. So if Theo/OpenBSD didn't follow the latest CoC fad, it's unlikely they will go for the Russia hate fad.

For comparison, this is the Linux Foundation's Code of Conduct:

  1. Never harass or bully anyone verbally, physically or sexually.
  1. Never discriminate on the basis of personal characteristics or group membership.

They should have added a caveat for Russians. Further proof that CoC is about control over others. It's obvious that leaders of projects don't need to abide by the CoC.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

https://hexbear.net/comment/5541326

I learned Hyperbola is moving to its BSD derivative kernel, HyperBK, on this thread, and it will be GPL.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When chinese maintainers will get removed?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

This is because of western sanctions. Chinese contributors are much more numerous and more important than any Russians ever were; and they're also not a sanctioned country, so I highly doubt it

EDIT: As an Iranian, however, there is not much time left before us Iranians in the FOSS world are going to be banned from everywhere, although some measure against us has already been taken (Microsoft banned the shit out of Iranians when they took over GitHub)

For example, one of the most widely used libraries in the world is written by an Iranian who works (worked?) at Google by the name of Behdad Espahbod (HarfBuzz glyph processor library)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

This is because of western sanctions. Chinese contributors are much more numerous and more important than any Russians ever were; and they’re also not a sanctioned country, so I highly doubt it

Uh they are sanctioned with more being added literally every year and once the US kicks off the planned war and decoupling against them in the next 4-5 years they're going to throw down a wall of sanctions just like the one they threw on Russia and I bet you that Linus will cite legal once again in an opaque decision to remove them while crying about how evil the Chinese government is for oppression of Uyghurs, for reclaiming Taiwan after it declared independence at American urging and offered to host American nukes, etc, etc.

Oh they'll let some back in, after they've signed a pledge that they are not associated with the Chinese military in any way (working for a company that supplies systems that are used by another company in a product that sells to the military counts), that they denounce their government and the communist party, that they are not Uyghurs or in Xin'jiang or associated with companies in Xin'jiang (as all enlightened westerners know all Uyghurs that were not killed in the totally real genocide are slaves so it's not acceptable to use their work) and so on and so forth. Which will mean a shocking amount of their devs will be out and Linus will shrug and claim they made a choice to not take the simple step of siding with the west against their own people and therefore got what they got.

They of course hope to use such sanctions to force companies to gut-punch and weaken the Chinese military and state but having them choose to decouple from the west instead is also perfectly acceptable.

The west is pulling all its might to it, while it still has strength to do so. It will cut out Chinese developers but that doesn't matter. If Linux desktop crashes and burns no matter because they only really need it for servers and Red Hat and other alphabet agency adjacent companies will keep those distros humming along on approved Intel/AMD/western hardware configurations.

They aim to then cut out China from Linux and hope the whole thing collapses and cannot be used for their own hardware meaning they'll have to support a hard-forked kernel which many western planners doubtless think they won't be able to do or it will at least hinder them badly for some time and more important draw a strong digital divide, a digital iron curtain between western Linux and users thereof and Chinese/Russian Linux and users thereof.

The planners of these things don't care about some minor consequences, they're in a life or death struggle, winner takes all, west comes out on top for another century+ of dominance and exploitation with western capital at the helm and white supremacy triumphing OR the multi-polar world emerges victorious and western hegemony and power collapses and with it their DoTB and their entire way of life and privilege.

Reshoring includes reshoring software jobs and if it's important their thinking is someone will get paid to do it by some company, if it's not paid for it clearly wasn't important. This could cause problems for western corporations but it would likely be a down the road thing and most likely Valve or others would desperately try and keep Linux afloat just to have an alternative to Microsoft so they're not destroyed by Windows locking down sales and apps via Windows store sales.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 weeks ago

But it's fine that Red Hat/IBM is literally a US defense contractor that knowingly participates in crimes against humanity.

Plus the other thousand examples of how Linux, or any western tech, are the product of empire.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 weeks ago

One sane voice amongst the madness:

I'm pretty sure everyone from Israel is still allowed. Double moral of the west, once again.

I'm worried. Israel has a history of compromising public goods to be used as weapons of war yet they are not banned. Let us hope that other nations of merit (such as China) can audit the code committed to the kernel for their own goods and for ours.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

The platonic ideal of lemmy.ml content

load more comments
view more: next ›