this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
611 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

58689 readers
4032 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 hours ago

I have no issue with the safety of nuclear power plants, however: fissile material is no more renewable than fossil fuels even if it's much greener. Also, in terms of more localized ecological damage, uranium mining is a disaster.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium_mining_and_the_Navajo_people

Maybe Google should focus on building its plants near geothermal hotspots instead if it's forced to suck up vast amounts of power for AI no one wants.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Boy are they gonna look stupid when they realize that no one outside their little bubble has a use for AI.

It’s not even close to ready for launch and why are we wasting energy on it?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Actually this going to be great news when the AI Bust happens because we'll still have more clean power and we won't be wasting it on stupid bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 minutes ago

immediately turns AI datacenters into Bitcoin mining centers

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

because idiots like me who have no marketable skills can use it to fool ourselves into thinking we can do code/art/literature/etc.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Hey don't be so hard on yourself

You can also use it to fool the rubes around you

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

sadly, I have a moral compass. I'm not sure where I put the damn thing, but I have one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

actually this (yes, I'm replying to myself). I'm an idiot with no marketable skills. I put boxes on shelves for a living. I want to be an artist, a musician, a programmer, an author. I am so bad at all of these, and between having a full time job, a significant other, and several neglected hobbies, I don't have time to learn to get better at something I suck at. So I cheat. If I want art done, I could commission a real artist, or for the cost of one image I could pay for dalle and have as many images as I want (sure, none of them will be quite what I want but they'll all be at least good). I could hire a programmer, or I could have chatgpt whip up a script for me since I'm already paying for it anyway since I want access to dalle for my art stuff. Since I have chatgpt anyway, I might as well use it to help flesh out my lore for the book I'll never write. I haven't found a good solution for music.

I have in my brain a vision for a thing that is so fucking cool (to me), and nobody else can see it. I need to get it out of my brain, and the only way to do that is to actualize it into reality. I don't have the skills necessary to do it myself, and I don't have the money to convince anyone else to help me do it. generative AI is the only way I'm going to be able to make this work. Sure, I wish that the creators of the content that were stolen from to train the ai's were fairly compensated. I'd be ok with my chatgpt subscription cost going up a few dollars if that meant real living artists got paid, I'm poor but I'm not broke.

These are the opinions of an idiot with no marketable skills.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Makes sense. Sometimes only once out into reality then only we'll know if it is a great idea, or not. But it doesn't hurt to have the tools to try. Those who want really high quality stuffs can go to the humans (and pay them good money) to make it even better.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

If I find any degree of success, then absolutely I will hire real humans to help me with my vision.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 26 minutes ago

I wish you the best of luck with your endeavours!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 hours ago

checks notes Shareholders?!

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

AI seems perfect for renewables load balancing. Got extra power to burn because it is windy at night? Train your models

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

AI power cost has quickly outscaled increases in power production. AI Datacenters alone are projected to consume more power than Japan sooner than 2030.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago

Lol, now just let AI manage the reactors, then give it access to manufacturing tech and we have every machine takeover scenario ever.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Nuclear has never been profitable without massive government subsidies and guarantees, and ~~Google~~ Kairos too will either manage to collect those or lose money.

It’s unclear how Google and Kairos set up the deal — whether the former is providing direct funding or if it just promised to buy the power that the latter generates when its reactors are up and running. Nevertheless, Kairos has already passed several milestones, making it one of the more promising startups in the field of nuclear energy.

I guarantee you, they are shouldering on none of the risk (like the Chinese and French at Hinkley Point), and this startup will be going down.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

Yay, more ads to pay for Google’s reactors.

load more comments
view more: next ›