this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
974 points (97.8% liked)

memes

10666 readers
2616 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (18 children)

I am not for ads but what is so difficult about adding them to the video stream. This should make adblockers useless since they can't differentiate between the video and the ad. I could just imagine it would be difficult to track the view time of the user and this could make the view useless since they can't prove it to the ad customer. I have no in depth knowledge about hls but as I know it's an index file with urls to small fragments of the streamed file. The index file could be regenerated with inserted ad parts and randomized times to make blocking specific video segments useless.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (4 children)

It already happens, videos contain sponsored segments added by the creator.

But even those have a solution in the form of Sponsorblock, which crowdfunds the location in the video containing sponsored segments in order to skip them.

Google should face the fact that they won't ever be able to win.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Cause you need to insert it every time for every viewer. People get different ads and those ads obviously change over time. So embedding one ad into the video permanently makes no sense. I'm pretty sure YouTube does it the way they do cause the alternative is not feasible.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (5 children)

There is a whole topic in wasm called server side rendered DOM.

I hardly think there is a chance to block adds when they achieve it to render all the content on their side.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Web devs busy at work making the internet more and more unusable each day. And they wonder why I despise them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

There are twitch adblockers, it's just ublock origin that doesn't work on it anymore, people did find a way.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But unless the page ends up as just a single canvas/image you'll still get all the HTML tags which can be stripped before your browser renders them?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

There's already SASE solutions that host a virtual browser boundary-side and present the user a painted canvas rather than the original DOM:

Example - Prisma Access

Example - Zscaler Cloud Browser

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

I don't like to say this, but:

AI

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

It works really well, I want to support them and donate but I'm afraid YouTube will find a way to block them like they did to others...

[–] [email protected] 60 points 2 months ago

The mom should be Firefox and the kids the plugins.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›