You don't "shame" criminals, you prosecute them. Fucking get it right!
this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
72 points (96.2% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5380 readers
675 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Both. Often the point of prosecution is to "make an example of -", which is just a dry and long-winded way of shaming them.
No.
Identifying the worst problems is a necessary step to resolving them.
"Shaming" has nothing to do with it. Its like you have a high risk of lung cancer-- it's not shaming to tell you to quit smoking.
That assumes they have any shame
no, but kill all of them and overthrow the system that make them possible, yes
Or at least shut them down, and if they try to kill us, then it's war.
Thousands died 'for the economy' due to covid, goose, gander, etc
No, first Betteridge’s law applies. But also if these entities were shame-able in the first place they would not be in a position to be able to be the world’s worst climate criminals