this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
154 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

35115 readers
116 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

@geneva_convenience It's exactly the same that also happened several years ago between the US and the EU concerning civil planes. Here Boeing and Airbus compete against each other - and the US had the assumption, that the EU subsidized Airbus so that Boeing couldn't compete. Because of that the US thought about tariffs that would have countered this.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (10 children)

I'm so confused here. I was under the impression that the entire argument for capitalist markets was that they produce cheaper and better goods than is possible to do with central state planning. Yet, here we have the capitalist west complaining that Chinese state driven model if producing goods that western companies are simply not able to compete with. Somebody help me understand.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Capitalists hate capitalism. Competition is so irritating, because someone might undercut you. (And other people would cheat to win, just like you would, so you can't ever relax.)

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

Awww what's da madder widdle capitalist can't compete with a state run economy??

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago (2 children)

is this the famous "invisible hand of the market"?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

I assume this doesn't apply to Chinese parts used to manufacturer electric cars in the EU

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Great news for EU auto workers!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

oh yeah, the land of "free market" ...

PS: Stolen land

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Has the EU "champoined" free markets? I assumed that was more of a US buxzword.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Ofc. Electric cars are here to save the auto industry, not your health, safety, neighborhood, sustainability, kids, etc. #bancars

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 79 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Once again ordinary people in the West are saved from affordable, low-pollution living. And Western companies are saved from having to compete.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (5 children)

That's catchy, but not entirely true.

China heavily subsidizes EV manufacturers (and production in general), plus they have cheaper environmental and labour standards... it's not like there's a fair market EU companies can compete in.

PS: Yes, "western" countries have been playing along with China's deliberate long term strategy with full awareness of where it would lead, but that's another story that is both much older and has a much broader scope than the EV industry.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (4 children)

China heavily subsidizes EV manufacturers (and production in general)

And that's a bad thing? Any sensible government is going to subsidise renewable energy and electric vehicles. It makes both economic and environmental sense. Anyone not doing this is an idiot and a climate terrorist.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Can you explain to us what the problem with China subsidizing EV manufacturers is exactly? That's how China chooses to run their economy, and it's entirely their business. The whole argument for capitalist markets is that they're supposed to be more competitive last I checked. If that's not the case then maybe the west should reexamine its assumptions about how an economy should be run.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

They do this in an attempt to take over other markets.
If nothing else, they help get their brands into the world.
There's loads of chinese EVs driving around where I live now, so based on anecdotal evidence, it's working.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

@yogthos @gomp It's the capitalist textbook example, to conquer a market by undercutting prices and to crush competition in that market that cannot compete - and to later increase prices when there is no more competition. You can see this all over the world, not only with China and EVs, but also for example with Uber and the taxi business or Europe with their food exports to poorer countries outside the EU.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yay, no punishment for the european brands. What they were doing, slept?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Germany is upset about this because they sell cars to China. This will probable create Chinese counter tariffs on European cars.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Competition is good! Unless it makes shareholders sad.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›