this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
154 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

34656 readers
640 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

@geneva_convenience It's exactly the same that also happened several years ago between the US and the EU concerning civil planes. Here Boeing and Airbus compete against each other - and the US had the assumption, that the EU subsidized Airbus so that Boeing couldn't compete. Because of that the US thought about tariffs that would have countered this.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (10 children)

I'm so confused here. I was under the impression that the entire argument for capitalist markets was that they produce cheaper and better goods than is possible to do with central state planning. Yet, here we have the capitalist west complaining that Chinese state driven model if producing goods that western companies are simply not able to compete with. Somebody help me understand.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

Capitalists hate capitalism. Competition is so irritating, because someone might undercut you. (And other people would cheat to win, just like you would, so you can't ever relax.)

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

Awww what's da madder widdle capitalist can't compete with a state run economy??

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

is this the famous "invisible hand of the market"?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

If there was any doubt that Western society only functions to serve the oil overlords.....

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

I assume this doesn't apply to Chinese parts used to manufacturer electric cars in the EU

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Great news for EU auto workers!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

oh yeah, the land of "free market" ...

PS: Stolen land

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Has the EU "champoined" free markets? I assumed that was more of a US buxzword.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Ofc. Electric cars are here to save the auto industry, not your health, safety, neighborhood, sustainability, kids, etc. #bancars

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Once again ordinary people in the West are saved from affordable, low-pollution living. And Western companies are saved from having to compete.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (5 children)

That's catchy, but not entirely true.

China heavily subsidizes EV manufacturers (and production in general), plus they have cheaper environmental and labour standards... it's not like there's a fair market EU companies can compete in.

PS: Yes, "western" countries have been playing along with China's deliberate long term strategy with full awareness of where it would lead, but that's another story that is both much older and has a much broader scope than the EV industry.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

China heavily subsidizes EV manufacturers (and production in general)

And that's a bad thing? Any sensible government is going to subsidise renewable energy and electric vehicles. It makes both economic and environmental sense. Anyone not doing this is an idiot and a climate terrorist.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Can you explain to us what the problem with China subsidizing EV manufacturers is exactly? That's how China chooses to run their economy, and it's entirely their business. The whole argument for capitalist markets is that they're supposed to be more competitive last I checked. If that's not the case then maybe the west should reexamine its assumptions about how an economy should be run.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

They do this in an attempt to take over other markets.
If nothing else, they help get their brands into the world.
There's loads of chinese EVs driving around where I live now, so based on anecdotal evidence, it's working.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

@yogthos @gomp It's the capitalist textbook example, to conquer a market by undercutting prices and to crush competition in that market that cannot compete - and to later increase prices when there is no more competition. You can see this all over the world, not only with China and EVs, but also for example with Uber and the taxi business or Europe with their food exports to poorer countries outside the EU.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (4 children)

This is the market place, brah. If the US or EU want to keep up, they can subsidize EV manufacturing to the same degree. We are just too stuck on subsidizing O&G to realize that harvesting value from a dying industry is going to leave us out in the cold as the new technology matures.

Free market capitalism and what we operate under haven’t been the same thing for as long as I’ve been alive. What some may call “Communist China” is beating us at the game. Get on the bus or get run the fuck over.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is the market place, brah.

...

Free market capitalism

then talk about subsidies or non capitalist country controlling the currency, markets, VCs, etc.

What does that even mean?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I did… that was the part about extracting value from a dying industry.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I feel like we would need to utterly destroy the working class to the point that cheap Chinese EVs would become expensive if we were to compete at the same level. I could be wrong, but how many of the chinese workers are driving brand new evs?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Western manufacturing tends to be much more automation heavy. Chinese manufactures don't bother with buying a $100k machine that can make a car part when they can just hire 10 guys at $10k/yr to make that same part with a $50 drill press and some hand files.

It's not that it all strictly balances out, but if we actually gave a shit we could potentially be cost competitive for a lot of price brackets, especially given the costs to move whole ass cars across the Pacific.

Bear in mind these sub $10k Chinese EVs are not something US consumers would really be interested in buying, they are basically tiny car shaped golf carts with extremely minimalist feature sets. Think 'no audio system at' all type interiors.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yay, no punishment for the european brands. What they were doing, slept?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Germany is upset about this because they sell cars to China. This will probable create Chinese counter tariffs on European cars.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Competition is good! Unless it makes shareholders sad.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›