this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
479 points (97.2% liked)

Firefox

18649 readers
30 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 5) 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

Now imagine if they had something to advertise which people actually want!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I switched to a fork of Firefox (Zen) without their bs..

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Does this mean they are gonna brick ublock origin and force me to Google's 3.0 shit? (I forgot the name of it)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Manifest v3? I gather they're already moving towards this but not in a manner which harms ad blocking

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 150 points 4 months ago (22 children)

What if we could have a world that wasn't powered by ads? I'd like to get past this "only one way to run the internet" train of thought.

I'm just so tired of ads, commercials and advertising in general. It's exhausting.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if this has anything to do with the Google ad monopoly case?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We know that not everyone in our community will embrace our entrance into this market. But taking on controversial topics because we believe they make the internet better for all of us is a key feature of Mozilla’s history. And that willingness to take on the hard things, even when not universally accepted, is exactly what the internet needs today.

But you're not doing the hard things. You're doing the easy thing. Capitulation to surveillance capitalism is the easy thing.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

We know that not everyone in our community will embrace our entrance into this market... even when not universally accepted, is exactly what the internet needs today.

Every fucking tech corporation ever has said this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 months ago

Yeah, perhaps because advertisements go against the values that users look for in your browser?

[–] [email protected] 59 points 4 months ago (2 children)

In parallel to our existing consumer products, we have the opportunity to build a better infrastructure for the online advertising industry as a whole. Advertising at large cannot be improved unless the tech it’s built upon prioritizes securing user data. This is precisely why we acquired Anonym. 

Catering to the ad industry is backwards thinking, imo. Securing user data is easy enough if you do not collect it to begin with.

Imo, the fact companies have changed the narrative in favor of advertisers and data collection, proves only profit matters, not the people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 4 months ago (1 children)

She went on to work at eBay for 13 years, followed by PayPal, Skype, and Airbnb. source

why would Mozilla choose to be directed by an ebay+paypal+airbnb experience and can somebody with that background not think like this ☞

"Because Mozilla’s mission is to build a better internet. And, for the foreseeable future at least, advertising is a key commercial engine of the internet, and the most efficient way to ensure the majority of content remains free and accessible to as many people as possible."

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Advertising will not improve unless we address the underlying data sharing issues, and solve for the economic incentives that rely on that data.

thanks to Mozilla for assuming the responsibility of improving advertising

We can’t just ignore online advertising — it’s a major driver of how the internet works and is funded. We need to stare it straight in the eyes and try to fix it. For those reasons, Mozilla has become more active in online advertising over the past few years. - MARK SURMAN, PRESIDENT, MOZILLA source

if we stay with that metaphor of "We need to stare it straight in the eyes and try to fix it", it's not difficult to imagine Mark and Mozilla being swallowed by the monster he's "staring straight in the eyes" :/

i hope they can filter the shit Mozilla will include in Firefox from mull and mullvad

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

She's not particularly wrong, but this highlights the problem for me.

Why does the corporate arm behind one of the last "free" browsers out there need to become involved in this clear conflict of interest?

Why does this need to be developed as core functionality in the browser codebase instead of as an addon like most of the previous experiments?

There is repeated insistence that this is key to the future of the web. I don't neccessarily disagree. I disagree entirely that this should have any direct contact with the Firefox project. Create a separate subsidiary within Mozilla for this shit. Anything to maintain a wall between the clearly conflicting goals.

This all reads like a new CEO coming in hungry to make a mark rather than actually just be a steward to keeping business as usual going.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I will go against the tide here and welcome this change. The web is powered by advertising and tracking. It will happen whether Mozilla is part of it or not. In that case, I would much rather have a website using a Mozilla advertising service that is more ethical and respects the user more than the ones from big tech. It's a lesser of two evils and I support this. I would of course rather have no ads at all but we don't live in a fairy tale world and evil companies exist. And like most ads currently in Firefox, I fully trust we will be able to disable them easily, just like we can right now.

I think this is a good thing that Mozilla is finally trying to distance itself from Google's money because it ensures that maintaining the nonprofit is more sustainable

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If Mozilla starts being aggressive to ad blocking, I'll agree with the common opinion on this post. But for now I'm more less neutral. If the choice is Mozilla dies or they do some ad stuff, I'd rather the latter. Whether the current and former people running Mozilla have made the right decisions or not to get to this point is kind of irrelevant, because people do not want Mozilla to disappear (even if they claim otherwise) because Mozilla is still a major driver of privacy-oriented work in w3c and web in general.

Aside from that... The only real way to stop ads and tracking, or at least prevent selling and sharing of data outside of the 1st party collector, is a legal path. Whether Anonym/Mozilla is as private as they are claiming, their intent is at least what a realistic legal solution to web tracking would condone that would continue to allow for revenue via ads. There is no way ads will ever go away in a capitalist economy, so it'll need to do something, blocked or not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago

Technically correct: literally no one does fit the criteria for not everyone.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Ladybird is not usable yet, but it's an independent browser and engine that accepts donations

repo - https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird

youtube channel with monthly updates - https://www.youtube.com/@LadybirdBrowser/videos

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago

So is NetSurf, and has been for most of this century already. I mean, it's great to see people even caring about independent browsers, but NetSurf surely needs much more love (and more developers). :-)

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Squidward on the floor saying "Future, future"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

unsure

But actually hexbear does need a future Squidward. We've got others but we need future

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 74 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Not everyone?

Does anyone?

Good thing we can fork, I guess, but it's kinda sad to watch a previously good org die

[–] [email protected] 60 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Fork, blah, blah, blah.

When one of these forks doesn't depend on Mozilla to do all the heavy lifting of security updates and compatibility fixes, then maybe we can talk seriously about forks. But no fork does fuck-all towards the hard part of maintaining a web browser engine. So forks mean nothing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I've been using librewolf over the last week. Honestly.... It's a drop in replacement for me

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Does it support containers and sync settings between installs on multiple systems? If so I’m in without hesitation.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 4 months ago (3 children)

fuckFuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck Fuck

But at least forking is still an option. The instant they make any moves that inhibit forking or privacy on forks, Firefox will be completely dead. For now, it’s just gangrenous.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Good luck with even maintaining that fork up to date , with security threats and web standards changing so quickly.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Chromium manages (obsfucated binary blobs from google still being included aside)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I wish that most forks wouldn't be even worse. Pale Moon, the most interesting one, is a gang of patent trolls.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Pale Moon feels like it forked during the peak of Windows Vista, and hasn't updated its UI, or extension library since.

LibreWolf, Mullvad Browser, and Waterfox feel the most up to date, while being FOSS.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 41 points 4 months ago (2 children)

But taking on controversial topics because we believe they make the internet better for all of us is a key feature of Mozilla’s history.

Is it?

I would rather have a world where Mozilla is actively engaged in creating positive solutions for hard problems, than one where we only critique from the sidelines.

Maybe your users don't.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

In addition to your good points:

a world where Mozilla is actively engaged

That doesn't have to mean a world where Firefox itself is involved in this engagement, despite her insistence that it for some reason must be. Firefox is not Mozilla as a whole.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 months ago

Yeah adblock plus said the same thing. A lot of companies have said the same thing. It always comes down to greed

[–] [email protected] 172 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Hey, Laura. Fuck you. Fuck your profits and your corporate greed. Enshit yourself till you close down.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 88 points 4 months ago

Frankly, I'm surprised it took them so long to say this publicly. For over a year, Mozilla has had a de facto conflict of interest when it came to their stance on advertisements, so take anything they say about their necessity with a huge grain of salt...

May 2023: Mozilla purchases FakeSpot, a company that sells private data to advertisers. Mozilla keeps selling private data to advertisers to this day.

June 2024: Mozilla purchases Anonym, an AdTech company.

[–] [email protected] 132 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The enshitification of Firefox continues 😢

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 months ago

Cory Doctorow: "Disenshittify or die!" (YouTube)

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›