this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
476 points (97.2% liked)

Firefox

17740 readers
5 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 week ago (17 children)

I feel like I’m reading a different article than everyone else. The comments made me think the article would be adding advertisements, but it seems to be trying to find a way forward to facilitate advertisements while maintaining privacy.

Without technical details I’m not sure that’s a bad thing. I know lemmy is largely “Mozilla bad”, but I’m just not sure the comments are in line with the proposal.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Hard fork incoming in 3... 2... 1....

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago

This is just a huge fuck you to their community.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The only ones who will embrace it are the advertisers....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Thanks but

We are targeting a first Alpha release for early adopters in 2026.

We need an alternative before that

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Maybe this pushes the development a little bit. Would be a good opportunity to ask for funding and other means of help.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I honestly never expected the final death blow for Firefox to come from Mozilla.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Eh, they've been speedrunning this for years, this is just the most efficient way to get to the end goal of complete ruin.

I have a few alternative ideas, but I honestly don't think they're interested in hearing them.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Is this a response to the fact that they may not get paid for having Google as their default search engine? If so, I worry about a bunch of Linux distributions. It's ironic that a company's toxic virtual monopoly was paying for so much open software.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Maybe they've been infiltrated by bad actors from Google, parading around as pro-privacy frauds.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Mozilla's PPA was developed in collaboration with Facebook. While we don't usually think of that company as advertisement centric, they are, just moreso within their own walled garden of a social network.

parading around as pro-privacy frauds.

Here's a frighteningly accurate prediction from The Register, written back in January:

...Baker notes: "We need to be faster in prototyping, launching, learning, and iterating ... This requires rich data, and so we will be moving in that direction, but in a very Mozilla way."

Surely not slurping telemetry?

According to the report, the "Mozilla way" is all about privacy, encryption, and keeping customer data safe. Hopefully, it will also be about innovation rather than scattering AI fairy dust over its product line.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

I hope so. I hope there could be a future where Mozilla is purged of these people and returned to being just a browser. Not everything has to be a "platform" with a business model for MBA's to feast on.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›