this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
727 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

60021 readers
1944 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Windows will no longer have an integrated basic rich-text-based word app.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Omg i use this to open shitty word docs at work, to dont make it swap much, as the word is a memory hog

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I guess it's to direct more people to Microsoft 365 and Word. I hope that in reality more people will start to use LibreOffice and others.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

My office had a period where we used LibreOffice and others because of some licensing dispute with Microsoft. However that period of peace ended when we migrated to 365.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've used windows since dos and have never once used wordpad in my entire life.
For basic text, notepad is just fine. For anything fancy, wordpad isn't good enough.
I feel that it doesn't have a place anywhere. It's like the bizarre paint 3D they've recently discontinued.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

iirc wordpad had spellcheck which was sort of convenient

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

I need any note taking app to require at least half a gigabyte of memory

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Could they please retire modern Windows UI design?

Those contrasting color squares are not the zen those designers think. UI layout being different in paradigm for every application is not the productivity improvement they think. Using titlebars for something other than titles and control buttons is not optimization. Those buttons being some scratches on the screen barely visible is crap from any PoV I can imagine.

And somebody should explain to them that a good design for a billboard, a good design for a glossy magazine, a good design for a shop front, a good design for an office, a good design for a videogame, a good design for a movie and a good design for a workstation are all mutually incompatible in vast majority of cases.

And again about zen, simplicity, air and all that. I understand they think they are very smart and understanding of aesthetics. But zen would be having clean window borders and clearly visible control elements, for starters. And buttons not being just color squares. And in general solutions being subordinate to functional goals of the UI being usable. Industrial ergonomics are zen.

EDIT: I know it's offtopic, not interested - keep walking

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

The drop-down text menu with dense options was good design. Adding the quick toolbar for more common tasks was also good design.

Moving everything from the text menu to the quick toolbar was bad design.

Just like the evolution of their search functionality. Started as an explorer feature (good), added to the start menu with a focus on program names (good), then they mixed web results from Bing and it's unclear if a program I'm searching for is installed and it found that or if it exists and the result is a link to some website (bad, if I wanted to search the fucking internet, I'd launch a fucking browser), also insisting on using their browser (wtf, they should have been broken up 20 fucking years ago, instead the courts decided to just fucking ignore them doing the same shit they lost the lawsuit for only much worse now).

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I remember a while back Microsoft did an market research thing and found that of their brands, "Xbox" had positive consumer feedback while many of their other product names weren't nearly as favorable.

So what did they do? Did they try to understand what Xbox did differently to leverage that strategy elsewhere? Did they promote the Xbox marketing team to give them a wider purview?

No. They just renamed Zune Music to Xbox Music and Games for Windows to Xbox for Windows. THAT'LL FIX IT!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

And then they tank the name X-Box

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (2 children)

"We need to recapture the Apple market share!"

"Got it boss, we'll make it stupid."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

"Get rid of those ugly strain reliefs on the plugs!"
"Uh, we don't make hardware."
"I don't care, get rid of them!"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

It just pains me to see, remember Chinese websites and software around 2007-2008?

Everybody (aware) looked at that with terror.

Now it's the same everywhere.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Pfew ... I moved to Linux just in time!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Gnome has already been ruined by a similar failed desire for a clean and simple interface.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Gnome has only gotten better imo

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

That was decades ago, though.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Now that's a name I haven't heard in a long time... A long time.

load more comments
view more: next ›