this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
1688 points (95.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

6021 readers
1417 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (16 children)

of course it's a furry shitposting about it.

They aren't wrong though, storage technology is only starting to come to market in significant enough capacity to be beneficial.

And for storage plants to be financially viable energy costs during the day need to be really cheap, so they can raise them at night and make a significant enough profit to break even.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

MIT thinking they're Doc Ock

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago

The problem with solar panels is that they produce energy the most when you least need it, and they produce the least when you most need it. Fuck the market. It's a resource storage and production management problem.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Before commenting, you should know there are 2 types of solar panels:

  • the ones owned by people (which may or may not feed into the grid)
  • the ones owned by corporations

The article is probably about the 2nd kind (if you can only sell energy when there is a surplus, your company will fail), while the twitter user makes it seem like the 1st kind was meant. We probably need to built more of both types. Identify what type the other commenters are talking about before getting in any arguments here.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

You have also made a good argument for socialized energy production. Any time you run into these situations where the optimal solution for a good society requires and is anti-profit, that's a good place for socialized ownership.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The real issue isn't the overproduction per se, but that we (globally speaking) don't have enough cheap scalable responsive distributed storage. I'm writing this from a privileged position since Switzerland has loads of dams and can pump water during such peaks. But it's clear that's not the solution everywhere. I hope a good cheap mass producible battery tech with less rare earth metal requirements comes along soon.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I applied to a company called Form Energy with a really interesting solution. They use the cheap simple ingredients of iron and water to rust and de-rust iron to store and release energy. It's less efficient than lithium-ion batteries but the cost is low and scalability is enormous. If it can make it past all of the hurdles and regulations it could be the solution to the energy storage problem for wind and solar.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago

that's a ridiculous argument tho. of course you can. just very selectively choose who you sell solar panels to

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›