Why. Why cinnamon arch.
Unixporn
Unixporn
Submit screenshots of all your *NIX desktops, themes, and nifty configurations, or submit anything else that will make themers happy. Maybe a server running on an Amiga, or a Thinkpad signed by Bjarne Stroustrup? Show the world how pretty your computer can be!
Rules
- Post On-Topic
- No Defaults
- Busy Screenshots
- Use High-Quality Images
- Include a Details Comment
- No NSFW
- No Racism or use of racist terms
Why not?
Kinda weird to have one of the hardest most customisable distros and choose one of the easiest to use, least customisable desktops
The whole point is the freedom of choice. I don't use Arch because it's "one of the hardest most customisable distros", but because it's rolling release, I like pacman
as a package manager, and the AUR is a great resource. I used Ubuntu with bspwm
and Arch with Gnome, and there's nothing wrong with either of those setups. It's all Linux in the end. Most of the differences between distros (for most "traditional" distros, at least) boil down to the install process, the init system, a set of default configurations/packages, and the package manager.
Don't play gatekeepers, please. It's dumb, nobody asked you to do it, your opinion is just that, and it's exactly this type of community behavior that turns people away from Linux. Thanks.