Yeah, but they meant to replace horses not motor vehicles.
Fuck Cars
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
If cars didn't replace horses, you'd have almost as many reasons to hate horses if bikes were available.
Well, mostly because of the shit being everywhere.
That, but there would also be pedestrians getting stepped on in cities.
Yeah it's based until you realise they're the invader
https://www.warhistoryonline.com/world-war-ii/japan-british-malaya-bicycles.html
The poster is for World War I. Your link is for World War II.
its just a sign of the times. bikes were easier/cheaper to maintain and take less space to stable than horses, especially in inner cities. Trams (electric 'streetcars') were probably only just starting to spread in the larger cities.
There would have been quite a few underground train lines in london that would go on to become 'the tube', but in early 1900s mostly still slow and dirty steam trains, electrification was starting, but fairly slow to phase out steam.
The 1890s had seen a bicycle boom/bubble following mass production of the chain drive 'safety' bicycle and Dunlop's pneumatic tyres. Even in 1912 cars were very few and far between compared to bikes
Obviously cars were starting to appear, but i suspect many more bikes and horses were still on the roads.
The british expeditionary force in 1914 still had many cavaly divisions, very little of the army would have been motorised at the start of WWI. things like tanks were developed during the war so pretty unheardof in 1912.
Someone call Mumen Rider!
Are army issued bikes any good?
First time I've ever felt like joining the army.
GOD SAVE THE KING
Wait, why does the army need more meat shields if God is going to save the King? You'd hope to at least get some of the credit.
God will save the King, us peasants have to save ourselves.