this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
78 points (97.6% liked)

UK Politics

3070 readers
56 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

i'd love an actual labour but sadly until election reform it's not going to mean anything. we we need is just a left wing pact between independents, labour back benchers, ~~the snp~~ though let's face it they're going further to the right than labour these days, pc, sinn fein, and the greens.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Ignorant American here, is that not what the Green Party is supposed to be? Is there a reason why Corbyn and the left wing labor/independent MP's shouldn't just join the Greens?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Not really. While the green party is left of labour. Its green credentials are pretty poor. Nimbyism has made them choose some rather odd positions.

This is an issue as it is a one issue named party. So like labour making odd non worker beneficial policies harms labour among left wing. Those nimby votes harm green reputation among green.

And while the 2 Green and left are not really related. They have a freaking huge crossover on a venn diagram. So both are rejected by a large % of the left.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

As a thought experiment, would supporting a workers union be left wing, even if it was for coal miners?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What's being green got to do with being left wing?

This is really the problem with left/right, you can be green and Tory or Labour. Green has little to do with supporting workers rights or supporting the church and monarchy.

[Edit] To clarify, being against building and preferring green spaces is a green position and also a driver for NIMBYs.

Tories get played as fools by their own party constantly, the little old dears in church voting Tory aren't supporting them because they keep moving more fash.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Ignorant Canadian but I know that around here the Greens aren't necessarily seen as the left wing party, in part because their program isn't broad enough

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

If Britain had proportional representation, they’d have a chance of being the leftmost party in left-of-centre coalitions alongside Labour and the Green Party (sort of like Die Linke in Germany or Vänsterpartiet in Sweden), or any least harrying a Labour-LibDem-Green-SNP-Plaid coalition from the left. Though under FPTP, they have a snowball’s chance in Hell, and are likely to serve as motivation for Labour to rule out electoral reform.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

After Left Unity, Breakthrough, Peace and Justice, Social Justice Party, and Transform, I'm sure this one will work out.

More seriously, I'm glad they're pursuing this. Everyone involved will be happier representing their views more authentically and Labour will be better off while freed from their influence, while the electorate will be presented a wider range of choices — and I suppose it's possible they won't make a pig's ear of it and that the two-ish party rigidity of our system could be broken, serving our democracy for the better.

Looks like a win-win-win-win to me.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I suppose it’s possible they won’t make a pig’s ear of it and that the two-ish party rigidity of our system could be broken

It will only be broken when voters work together to ensure it.

The left as a whole are too willing to divide the vote. So fptp harms us more than the right, as empathy and emotion is a lower effect on their voting intentions. (I am in no way saying PR would end the right, just increase the power of the left to match actual vote share. )

So the only possible way w can change FPTP if for the left to agree voting reform is the primary importance. Everything else must take a back seat to this. And even then it would take a few parliaments before the effect was powerful enough.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

All it means is that the left's vote gets split and conservatives get back into power

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's what they say on American subs too lol

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Because it is also true there. Any nation with fptp voting will push towards a 2 party system.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, we need electoral reform first 🙁

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

If only Labour hadn't rallied against it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

I suppose it’s possible they won’t make a pig’s ear of it and that the two-ish party rigidity of our system could be broken

You mean it's supposedly possible that the media won't start an even worse smear campaign in continued and unrelenting defence of said system.. I wouldn't hold your breath..