this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

theyknew

682 readers
1 users here now

Pictures created by people who knew full well how they could be interpreted. For pictures to fit in here there needs to be an element of plausible deniability, although it can be a tenuous one...

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Someone help, I only see shoes

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Mentally make the background foreground, if you can, so the bottom corners are something like legs.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Hex-head strikes again.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

I had to zoom in for a minute or two to see shoes. I'm just too biased.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The pubic hair kind of gives it away..

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Yeah, except that just ankle skin, not hair.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have looked at it for some minutes now. I don't see anything out of the ordinary.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nothing unusual about some daisy dukes at all

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm more confused now. What do you mean by dukes? Is the joke related to the weird shoes with open toes that for some reason have shoelaces when they don't need any?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

It's an 80s era pop culture reference.

There was a character on the tv show, the Dukes of Hazard, named Daisy Duke.

She was known for wearing very tight fitting, cut off jean shorts.

That type of shorts became known as "daisy dukes", and was later popularized again in a hip-hop song.

The image in the post, if you aren't looking at it right, looks like a nice ass in those kind of shorts.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Once I saw it, I couldn't see what I originally saw.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Same, once I saw the shoes the picture corrected itself (and i can't force myself to not see them now) but up until then it was like that duck/rabbit photo except both were.... something else.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

oth were.... something else.

go on..

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The illusion is so prominent I don't even know what else it could be

Edit Oh it's legs. Had to zoom very in

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Oh shit you're right.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Definitely made with the thumbnail in mind

Me scrolling by.